Trend in Square roots question [Curious Math Newb question]

  • Thread starter Thread starter nickadams
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Roots Square
AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the pattern of increases when squaring consecutive integers, noting that the increase for each number n is given by I_n = n^2 - n. The difference in these increases, D_n, is calculated as D_n = 2(n-1), indicating a linear relationship. This linearity is further illustrated by examining the differences in smaller square numbers, such as 9, 16, and 25. The participants emphasize the significance of understanding these mathematical relationships visually. Overall, the trend reveals a consistent pattern in the growth of squared integers.
nickadams
Messages
182
Reaction score
0
I noticed that 2 grows by 2 when it is squared, and 3 grows by 6 when it is squared, and 4 grows by 12, and 5 grows by 20... etc. etc.

So 3's increase when squared is 4 more than 2's increase when squared, and 4's increase when squared is 6 greater than 3's increase when squared, and 5's increase when squared is 8 bigger than 4's... etc. etc... <---The change from 4-5 is 2 bigger than the change from 3-4, and so on..



Why does this trend exist? Does it mean anything?


Thanks guys
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Well let's see...
It helps to be able to write number relations as math vis:
the increase in a number n when you square it is given by - I_n=n^2-n

the difference in the adjacent increases would be: D_n=I_n-I_{n-1} which would be:D_n=\big [ n^2-n \big ] - \big [ (n-1)^2 - (n-1) \big ] = 2(n-1)... which is linear.

That what you mean?
 
Simon Bridge said:
Well let's see...
It helps to be able to write number relations as math vis:
the increase in a number n when you square it is given by - I_n=n^2-n

the difference in the adjacent increases would be: D_n=I_n-I_{n-1} which would be:D_n=\big [ n^2-n \big ] - \big [ (n-1)^2 - (n-1) \big ] = 2(n-1)... which is linear.

That what you mean?

Oh thanks that was super helpful

The second part of my post was trying to say Dn - Dn-1 = 2 and that can be found by 2(n-1) - 2(n-1-1) = 2!
 
Notice also the same linearity in the simpler progression 9 - 4 = 5, 16 - 9 = 7, 25 - 16 = 9 ...

If you grasp visual concepts more easily, look at this:

squares.png


The multicoloured square on the left represents your original series, that on the right represents the simpler one mentioned above. In each case the two red squares are the difference between successive terms (in this case 62 and 72) - notice that in each large square the green and blue L-shapes are congruent.
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top