MHB Triangle Challenge: Prove $p^4+q^4+r^4-2p^2q^2-2q^2r^2-2r^2p^2<0$

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on proving the inequality $p^4+q^4+r^4-2p^2q^2-2q^2r^2-2r^2p^2<0$ for the sides of a triangle, denoted as $p$, $q$, and $r$. Participants highlight the need for a mathematical approach to demonstrate that the expression is negative under the triangle inequality conditions. The conversation includes admiration for a member's factoring skills, indicating a collaborative atmosphere focused on problem-solving. The goal remains clear: to establish the validity of the inequality specifically for triangle side lengths. Overall, the thread emphasizes mathematical proof and community engagement in tackling the challenge.
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Prove that $p^4+q^4+r^4-2p^2q^2-2q^2r^2-2r^2p^2<0$ for $p,\,q,\,r$ are the sides of a triangle.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
anemone said:
Prove that $p^4+q^4+r^4-2p^2q^2-2q^2r^2-2r^2p^2<0$ for $p,\,q,\,r$ are the sides of a triangle.

By the triangle inequality, $|p - q| < r < p + q$. Thus $(p - q)^2 < r^2 < (p + q)^2$; Using this, we find

$\displaystyle p^4 + q^4 + r^4 - 2p^2q^2 - 2q^2r^2 - 2r^2p^2$

$\displaystyle = (p^2 + q^2 - r^2)^2 - 4p^2q^2$

$\displaystyle = (p^2 + q^2 - r^2 - 2pq)(p^2 + q^2 - r^2 + 2pq)$

$\displaystyle = [(p - q)^2 - r^2][(p + q)^2 - r^2]$

$\displaystyle < 0$.
 
Last edited:
Euge said:
By the triangle inequality, $|p - q| < r < p + q$. Thus $(p - q)^2 < r^2 < (p + q)^2$; Using this, we find

$\displaystyle p^4 + q^4 + r^4 - 2p^2q^2 - 2q^2r^2 - 2r^2p^2$

$\displaystyle = (p^2 + q^2 - r^2)^2 - 4p^2q^2$

$\displaystyle = (p^2 + q^2 - r^2 - 2pq)(p^2 + q^2 - r^2 + 2pq)$

$\displaystyle = [(p - q)^2 - r^2][(p + q)^2 - r^2]$

$\displaystyle < 0$.

Hey Euge, you're so tremendously great at factoring to simplify any given math expressions and I admire all those heuristic skills that you posses! So I tip my hat to you!:cool:
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Back
Top