Triangle on a sphere (Schutz, 6.10)

AI Thread Summary
In the discussion on the triangle on a sphere from Schutz's general relativity, it is established that the sides of a spherical triangle are arcs of great circles, leading to an interior angle sum that exceeds 180°. The proof involves recognizing that parallel transport along the geodesics incurs no rotation until reaching the vertices, where the vector rotates by an angle equal to 180° minus the angle formed by the two sides. The total rotation upon returning to the starting point is calculated as 360° minus the excess angle (gamma) of the triangle. This demonstrates that the rotation of the vector during parallel transport corresponds to the angle excess over 180°. The exercise ultimately clarifies the relationship between spherical geometry and vector rotation in general relativity.
hellfire
Science Advisor
Messages
1,048
Reaction score
1
A first course in general relativity. B.F. Schutz. Exercise 6.10:
A straight line in a sphere is a great circle, and it is well known that the sum of interior angles of any triangle on a sphere whose sides are arcs of great circles exceeds 180°. Show that the amount by which a vector is rotated by parallel transport around such a triangle equals the excess of the sum of the angles over 180°.
How to proceed to prove this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hellfire said:
A first course in general relativity. B.F. Schutz. Exercise 6.10:
A straight line in a sphere is a great circle, and it is well known that the sum of interior angles of any triangle on a sphere whose sides are arcs of great circles exceeds 180°. Show that the amount by which a vector is rotated by parallel transport around such a triangle equals the excess of the sum of the angles over 180°.
How to proceed to prove this?
The first step is to recognize that since each side of the triangle is a great circle (geodesic), a vector parallel transported along that geodesic experiences no rotation. The rotation occurs only at each vertex where the vector is rotated by an angle equal to 180 less the angle made by the two sides of the triangle. So the total angle of rotation after returning to its starting point is (180-a1 + 180 - a2 + 180 - a3). But since we know that a1 + a2 + a3 = 180 + gamma (where gamma is the difference you are looking for):
\theta = 540 - (180 + \gamma)) = 360 - \gamma

AM
 
Thank you Andrew. This was quite easier than I had supposed.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top