Triangle Problem: Prove (a+1)(b+1)(c+1) < 4

  • Thread starter Thread starter FeDeX_LaTeX
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Triangle
AI Thread Summary
The problem involves proving that for the sides of a triangle a, b, and c, with the condition ab + bc + ca = 1, the inequality (a+1)(b+1)(c+1) < 4 holds true. Initial attempts included using the arithmetic/harmonic mean inequality and various substitutions, leading to a complex expression that seemed difficult to simplify. A breakthrough was noted in recognizing that (a + 1)(b + 1)(c + 1) - 4(ab + bc + ca) relates to the product (a - 1)(b - 1)(c - 1), suggesting that the right-hand side is negative. The final challenge remains to show that a, b, and c are all less than 1, which is essential for the proof. This discussion highlights the intricacies of approaching inequalities in triangle geometry.
FeDeX_LaTeX
Science Advisor
Messages
436
Reaction score
13

Homework Statement



Let a, b and c be the lengths of the sides of a triangle. Suppose that ab + bc + ca = 1. Show that (a+1)(b+1)(c+1) < 4.


Homework Equations


N/A (Olympiad problem)


The Attempt at a Solution


I've made a few inroads at this problem, but whether or not they're going to take me in the right direction, I'm not sure. I used the arithmetic/harmonic mean inequality to show that:

9abc \leq a + b + c

and I've used substitutions from their original equation to arrive at

8(a+b+c) \leq (a+b)(1+9c^2) + (b+c)(1+9a^2) + (a+c)(1+9b^2)

but I'm puzzled at where to go from here. I don't think it would be useful to consider specific cases such as the equilateral triangle (a = b = c), since we appear to be trying to prove a general case, and I know I mustn't start from their solution and show that it's equal to the original equation.

Am I taking the right approach? Is a geometric approach better? Any hints/tips anyone can give, without giving me the answer?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I recognise that

(a + 1)(b + 1)(c + 1) - 2(ab + bc + ca) - 2 = (a - 1)(b - 1)(c - 1)

and so

(a + 1)(b + 1)(c + 1) - 4(ab + bc + ca) = (a - 1)(b - 1)(c - 1)

...I feel like I'm close, but not sure where to place the final step.

EDIT: Ugh, it's obvious... clearly the RHS is smaller than zero, so...

(a+1)(b+1)(c+1) &lt; 4(ab + bc + ca)
(a+1)(b+1)(c+1) &lt; 4

Done.
 
Last edited:
How do I show that a, b and c are all smaller than 1 though? It's a requirement for the above. I thought it could just be assumed but it is not as simple as that.
 
Back
Top