Tricky Torque Problem: Solving for Tension and Understanding Beam Forces

  • Thread starter Thread starter Arooj
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Torque
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on solving a torque problem involving a massless beam, where the net force and net torque must equal zero. Participants clarify that the tension (T) in the beam can be determined by applying equilibrium conditions, leading to the equation 980 = sin 37 T. The conversation emphasizes understanding the forces acting on the beam, including the force exerted by the wall, which creates compression. It is noted that the net force must balance out, with forces acting in opposing directions to achieve equilibrium. The importance of separating x and y components of force to analyze the system is also highlighted.
Arooj
Messages
39
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


65zm9i.jpg


The writing was just my reasoning, which I don't think is right.
Assume the beam is massless.

Homework Equations


T = Fd sin θ
F = mg
net force must be zero.
net torque must be zero.

The Attempt at a Solution


d * 1/2F + 980 = d * (sin 37) T
1/2 F + 980 = (sin 37) T
I don't know what to do from here.
I can mathematically solve the problem to an extent, but conceptually I don't understand how to do the problem. Can someone explain to me how to do the problem from scratch and the reasoning for steps (like what forces are acting on the beam)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Arooj said:
d * 1/2F + 980 = d * (sin 37) T
1/2 F + 980 = (sin 37) T
What's F? I thought the beam was massless.

To solve this sort of problem, apply the conditions for equilibrium. The net torque = 0 is one of them. What are the others?
 
ah, so there is no F, meaning it would just be 980 = sin 37 T, where T is the tension.
net force = zero, forces left = forces right, forces up = forces down, clockwise torques = counterclockwise torques, x and y components of force may separately be set to 0. And T cos 37 would give the force exerted by the wall, I assume?
 
Arooj said:
ah, so there is no F, meaning it would just be 980 = sin 37 T, where T is the tension.
Right.
net force = zero, forces left = forces right, forces up = forces down, clockwise torques = counterclockwise torques, x and y components of force may separately be set to 0. And T cos 37 would give the force exerted by the wall, I assume?
Exactly.
 
And compression would thus be opposite to the force exerted by the wall, for a net force of zero?
 
Arooj said:
And compression would thus be opposite to the force exerted by the wall, for a net force of zero?
Yes, the net force is zero. The force exerted by the wall is the compression.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top