Tricky Trig Identity: Solving sin(3x)cos(x)=sin(x)cos(x)(3-sin^2(x))

  • Thread starter Thread starter relativitydude
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Identity Trig
AI Thread Summary
The equation sin(3x)cos(x) = sin(x)cos(x)(3-sin^2(x)) is identified as problematic, with suggestions to use addition formulas and expand sin(3x). A key point made is that the identity should be correctly expressed as cos(x)sin(3x) ≡ cos(x)sin(x)(3-4sin^2(x)). The discussion emphasizes that an identity must hold true for all values of x, illustrating this with the example x = π/4. Overall, the conversation highlights the importance of verifying trigonometric identities for accuracy.
relativitydude
Messages
70
Reaction score
0
This is a tricky one, sin(3x)cos(x)=sin(x)cos(x)(3-sin^2(x))

I have tried addition formulas and expanding sin(3x) into something else, any help?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
That's not just "tricky", it's false! Try x= \frac{\pi}{4}.
 
Like Halls said, remember that an identity is an equation that all values are solutions.
 
It should have been

\cos x\sin 3x\equiv \cos x\sin x\left(3-4\sin^{2}x\right)

Daniel.
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top