Tricky V I Graph Need help please

  • Thread starter Thread starter Steve12345
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Graph
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around determining the gradient of a graph related to voltage (V) and current (I) measurements across a battery. Participants clarify that as the load resistor value decreases, the loop current increases, leading to a decrease in measured source voltage due to internal resistance. The confusion arises regarding whether the slope of the graph should be positive or negative since the voltmeter measures across the battery. It is emphasized that the graph should reflect the relationship defined by the equation V = emf - I*r, which corresponds to the battery's internal resistance. Ultimately, the participants encourage the poster to clarify their graph construction based on these principles.
Steve12345
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Physics news on Phys.org
What do you mean by 'gradient'?

You might consider taking more than 1 measurement of I and V ...
 
Last edited:
Steve12345 said:
need help with this question, is the gradient negative or positive since the voltmeter is over the battery?
Here is the image (sorry for making you tilt your heads)https://www.dropbox.com/sh/v6ydqbfrg20whtb/ZWR-r9ZOSH?lst#f:q17.JPG

As the load resistor value gets smaller, the loop current increases, and the measured source voltage decreases because of the increasing voltage drop across the voltage source's internal resistance.

Does that make sense? Can you now show us your work on the graph?
 
berkeman said:
As the load resistor value gets smaller, the loop current increases, and the measured source voltage decreases because of the increasing voltage drop across the voltage source's internal resistance.

Does that make sense? Can you now show us your work on the graph?

I drew a line that made a triangle from the V axis to the I axis, so when the current was at its highest V was 0 and when V was at its highest I was 0, so it was a negative slope.

I used emf= V+Ir and rearranged it go get emf - Ir = V. I am confused at wether the graph should be the a positive slope since the voltmeter is measuring the battery and not the load resistor if you get where I am coming from
 
berkeman said:
As the load resistor value gets smaller, the loop current increases, and the measured source voltage decreases because of the increasing voltage drop across the voltage source's internal resistance.

Does that make sense? Can you now show us your work on the graph?

So I am saying I drew it like this http://www.s-cool.co.uk/a-level/assets/learn_its/alevel/physics/Resistance/internal-resistance-emf-and-potential-difference/Finding%20the%20internal%20resistance.gif

Does it make a difference to the graph that were measuring V at a different point
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Steve12345 said:
So I am saying I drew it like this http://www.s-cool.co.uk/a-level/assets/learn_its/alevel/physics/Resistance/internal-resistance-emf-and-potential-difference/Finding%20the%20internal%20resistance.gif

Does it make a difference to the graph that were measuring V at a different point

Your graph is fine as far as it goes.

I don't understand your question abot V being measured "at a different point". The problem shows exactly where V is measured - across the battery including its internal resistance. Your equation V = emf - I*r fully corresponds to the diagram of the problem.

Now, how do you propose to construct your graph? You don't know emf or r. You're supposed to use the graph to determine emf and r.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top