Simplifying Trig Equations: A Comparison

There's no other way to explain it.I was talking about the inverse sine only because the OP was talking about it, and I said that this wasn't the way to go.No there is a way to use the inverse sine to get these solutions, but it is not as simple as saying$$\theta = \sin^{-1}\left(\dfrac{1}{2}\right) = \dfrac{\pi}{6}$$This is an oversimplification.The inverse sine function is one-to-one, meaning that each output value has exactly one input value. This means that if ##\sin(\theta) = \sin(\phi)##, then ##\theta = \phi##, and the inverse function can
  • #1
ciubba
65
2
I simplified a trig equation to

[tex]\theta=\Big\{sin^{-1}(\frac{1}{2})+2\pi k\Big\}\; and \; \Big\{\pi-sin^{-1}(\frac{1}{2})+2\pi k\Big\}[/tex]

Whereas the book simplified it to

[tex]\theta=\pm\frac{\pi}{6}+\pi k[/tex]

Obviously these answers encompass the same set of values, with the book's answer being much simpler. How would one simplify my answer into the book's form?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
ciubba said:
I simplified a trig equation to

[tex]\theta=\Big\{sin^{-1}(\frac{1}{2})+2\pi k\Big\}\; and \; \Big\{\pi-sin^{-1}(\frac{1}{2})+2\pi k\Big\}[/tex]

Whereas the book simplified it to

[tex]\theta=\pm\frac{\pi}{6}+\pi k[/tex]

Obviously these answers encompass the same set of values, with the book's answer being much simpler. How would one simplify my answer into the book's form?
The two answers are different, so you can't go from what you have to the book's answer.
The book's answers include ##7\pi/6## and ##11\pi/6## and your answers don't include these and a bunch more.

It would help if you showed us the equation you started from.

Also, please don't delete the three parts of the template...
 
  • #3
Sorry, I wrote down my answer incorrectly. The one halves should be plus or minus.

Here is the question:

solve the following trig equation (in radians):
[tex]2sin^2(\theta)-cos(2\theta)=0[/tex]

I translated everything into sin via the double angle formula, so

[tex]2sin^2\theta-(1-2sin^2\theta)=0[/tex]

[tex]4sin^2\theta-1=0[/tex]

[tex]sin\theta=\pm \sqrt {\frac{1}{4}}[/tex]

[tex]sin^{-1}\bigg(sin(\theta)\bigg)=sin^{-1}\Big(\pm \sqrt{\frac{1}{4}}\Big)[/tex]

[tex]
\theta=\Big\{sin^{-1}(\pm\frac{1}{2})+2\pi k\Big\}\; and \; \Big\{\pi-sin^{-1}(\pm\frac{1}{2})+2\pi k\Big\}[/tex]

My guess is that the book factored [tex]4sin^2\theta-1[/tex] and then solved from there.

Edit: Actually, factoring gave me [tex]\theta=\Big\{\frac{\pi}{6}+2\pi k \Big\} \; and \; \Big\{\frac{5\pi}{6}+2\pi k \Big\} [/tex]
 
Last edited:
  • #4
You're better off working with this -- ##sin\theta=\pm \sqrt {\frac{1}{4}} = \pm \frac{1}{2}## directly, rather than taking the inverse sine of both sides. The inverse trig functions are one-to-one, so you tend to lose solutions when you use them.

If ##sin(\theta) = 1/2##, then ##\theta = \pi/6 + 2k\pi## or ##\theta = 5\pi/6 + 2k\pi##, with similar work for the negative value of ##sin(\theta)##.
 
  • #5
For [tex]sin\theta=\frac{1}{2}[/tex], don't I still need to take the inverse sin function in order to determine the value of theta? Also, that still doesn't really answer my question of how to facilitate the transfer of [tex]
\theta=\Big\{\frac{\pi}{6}+2\pi k \Big\} \; and \; \Big\{\frac{5\pi}{6}+2\pi k \Big\}[/tex] to
[tex]\theta=\pm\frac{\pi}{6}+\pi k[/tex]

This one wasn't too confusing, but I'd like a general analytic approach to that simplification, if one exists.
 
  • #6
ciubba said:
For [tex]sin\theta=\frac{1}{2}[/tex], don't I still need to take the inverse sin function in order to determine the value of theta?
If you apply the inverse sine to both sides of the above, you get one value: ##\theta = \pi/6##. But ##\theta = 5\pi/6## is also a solution. In fact, there are an infinite number of solutions to your equation above; namely, ##\theta = \pi/6 + 2k\pi# and ##\theta = 5\pi/6 + 2k\pi#, where k is an integer.
ciubba said:
Also, that still doesn't really answer my question of how to facilitate the transfer of [tex]
\theta=\Big\{\frac{\pi}{6}+2\pi k \Big\} \; and \; \Big\{\frac{5\pi}{6}+2\pi k \Big\}[/tex] to
[tex]\theta=\pm\frac{\pi}{6}+\pi k[/tex]
What you show for ##\theta## above are only the solutions for ##sin(\theta) = 1/2##. You need to combine these solutions with those of the other equation, ##sin(\theta) = -1/2##, and then list four or five members of each set of solutions, and you'll see how this can be simplified to what the book has.
 
  • #7
I don't understand any of Mark44's inverse sine talk.
$$\dfrac{5\pi}{6}-\left(-\dfrac{\pi}{6}\right)=\pi$$
so they generate the same set.
to see this more clearly write
$$-\dfrac{\pi}{6}+n\, \pi=\dfrac{5\pi}{6}+(n-1)\, \pi$$
 
  • #8
lurflurf said:
I don't understand any of Mark44's inverse sine talk.
$$\dfrac{5\pi}{6}-\left(-\dfrac{\pi}{6}\right)=\pi$$
so they generate the same set.
I'm not sure what the above has to do with this problem. In the first post of this thread, ciubba had this as his solution set (slightly simplified):
##\theta = \pi/6 + 2k\pi## or ##\theta = 5\pi/6 + 2k\pi##
He claimed that the above was the same as the book's solution, which was ##\theta =\pm \pi/6 + k\pi. I said that ciubba's solution and the book's solution are not the same, and then he/she admitted that a sign was missing.
lurflurf said:
to see this more clearly write
$$-\dfrac{\pi}{6}+n\, \pi=\dfrac{5\pi}{6}+(n-1)\, \pi$$
 
  • #9
yes post#1 had a typo which he/she corrected in post #3 after you pointed it out.
Then you started talking about inverse sine
the question was how do we know that
$$-\dfrac{\pi}{6}+n\, \pi \text{ and } \dfrac{5\pi}{6}+n\, \pi$$
are the same set? we know because
$$\dfrac{5\pi}{6}-\left(-\dfrac{\pi}{6}\right)=\pi$$
if we look for solutions in one period say $$(-\pi,\pi]$$
we find $$-\dfrac{5\pi}{6} \\ -\dfrac{\pi}{6} \\ \phantom{-}\dfrac{\pi}{6} \\ \phantom{-}\dfrac{5\pi}{6}$$
we can give all solutions as
$$-\dfrac{5\pi}{6} +2k\pi \\ -\dfrac{\pi}{6}+2k\pi \\ \phantom{-}\dfrac{\pi}{6}+2k\pi \\ \phantom{-}\dfrac{5\pi}{6}+2k\pi$$
we can combine these into two using plusminus
$$\pm\dfrac{5\pi}{6} +2k\pi \\ \pm\dfrac{\pi}{6}+2k\pi$$
after we notice
$$\dfrac{5\pi}{6}-\left(-\dfrac{\pi}{6}\right)=\pi$$
we combine into one
$$\pm\dfrac{\pi}{6} +k\pi$$
or
$$\pm\dfrac{5\pi}{6} +k\pi$$
these are the same since since
$$\dfrac{5\pi}{6}-\left(-\dfrac{\pi}{6}\right)=\pi$$
 
  • #10
lurflurf said:
yes post#1 had a typo which he/she corrected in post #3 after you pointed it out.
Then you started talking about inverse sine
I was talking about the inverse sine only because the OP was talking about it, and I said that this wasn't the way to go.
 
  • #11
$$\sin^{-1}\left(\dfrac{1}{2}\right) \text{ and } \frac{\pi}{6}$$ are two names for the same number, they mean the same thing.
 

1. What is the purpose of simplifying trig equations?

The purpose of simplifying trig equations is to make them easier to work with and understand. This can also help to identify patterns and relationships between different trigonometric functions.

2. How do you simplify trig equations?

To simplify trig equations, you can use trigonometric identities, properties, and rules to rewrite the equations in a simpler form. This may involve factoring, combining like terms, or using special angles to eliminate terms.

3. Can simplifying trig equations change the value of the equation?

Yes, simplifying trig equations can change the value of the equation. However, it should not change the overall solution or solutions to the equation. Simplifying can help to reveal equivalent forms of the equation that may be easier to work with.

4. How does simplifying trig equations compare to simplifying algebraic equations?

Simplifying trig equations and algebraic equations follow similar principles, such as combining like terms and using properties and rules to rewrite the equations. However, simplifying trig equations also involves using trigonometric identities and special angles, which may not be applicable in simplifying algebraic equations.

5. Are there any tips for simplifying trig equations more efficiently?

Yes, a few tips for simplifying trig equations more efficiently include: becoming familiar with common trig identities and their variations, practicing solving different types of trig equations, and breaking down the equation into smaller parts before attempting to simplify it.

Similar threads

  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
943
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
984
  • General Math
Replies
1
Views
128
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
961
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
178
  • Calculus
Replies
29
Views
444
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
11
Views
197
Back
Top