Trig function names: math history?

EnumaElish
Science Advisor
Messages
2,346
Reaction score
124
Does anyone know how the function names sin, cos, csc, sec, ... came about?

Wouldn't they be easier to remember if cos was 1/sin; csc was 1/sec; just like cot is 1/tan? (Instead of 1/sin = csc and 1/cos = sec.)

This is one thing in trig that always throws me off.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Probably a read of this link would help you appreciate the usage of these words,
http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/HistTopics/Trigonometric_functions.html

Note that these notations came out of necessity (for simplification) and not through a magic wand :smile:

-- AI
 
Bah. Here we just learn sin, cos and tan. Period.
Why use extra terms (csc, sec cot) for 1/sin etc. You hardly encounter them anywhere anyway. Trig is complicated enough with all the relations among sin, cos and tan. It's only making it more complicated.
 
The "co" is from the fact that the cosine is the sine of the complementary angle (90 degrees minus θ- the other angle in the right triangle). Same for cotangent, cosecant. Perfectly reasonable.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
28
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top