Trignometric identities question

  • Thread starter Thread starter tempeste
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    identities
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving the trigonometric equation 2sin²(x) + sin(x) - 1 = 0. Participants clarify that the transformation to 2(1 - cos²(x)) + cos²(x) is incorrect, as it misrepresents the original equation. The correct approach involves substituting sin(x) with a variable p, leading to the quadratic equation 2p² + p - 1 = 0. The solution requires applying the quadratic formula to find the correct values of p, rather than misapplying algebraic manipulations. Ultimately, the focus is on accurately solving the quadratic equation derived from the trigonometric identity.
tempeste
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi,

the question is

2sin^2 + sinX -1 = 0

I think the next step is then

2(1-cos^2)+cos^2=0

Did I do something wrong because I cannot seem to continue the question?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Just replace sin(x) by a variable p.
the equations then is 2p² + p - 1 = 0

Solve this equation for p and then set these solutions equal to sin(x)
At best you will have two goniometric equations to solve

marlon
 
tempeste said:
Hi,

the question is

2sin^2 + sinX -1 = 0

I think the next step is then

2(1-cos^2)+cos^2=0

Did I do something wrong because I cannot seem to continue the question?

Yes,i've colored in red what is wrong,namely
\sin x -1=\cos^{2} x

That is wrong...As an indentity.It is valid as an equation in "x",which,i'm afraid,is not really equivalent to your initial one...

Daniel.
 
I still don't really understand...

I tried it marlon's way

2p^2+p-1=0
2p^2+p=1
2p+p=1 (squareroot)
3p=1
p=1/3

Is the right?
 
tempeste said:
I still don't really understand...

I tried it marlon's way

2p^2+p-1=0
2p^2+p=1
2p+p=1 (squareroot)
3p=1
p=1/3

Is the right?

Not at all.

Can you solve an equation like ax² + bx + c = 0 ?
Discriminant D = b² -4ac

first solution = \frac{-b + \sqrt{D}}{2a}
second solution = \frac{-b - \sqrt{D}}{2a}

Just apply this to your equation where x is now p

marlon
 
No, it isn't.

square root of 2p^2+ p is NOT 2p+ p!

Can you factor 2p^2+ p- 1?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top