Trigonometric Roots and Substitutions: Solving Equations in Terms of Pi

  • Thread starter Thread starter Gughanath
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving the cubic equation 2x^3-5x^2-4x+3=0, with initial roots incorrectly identified as x=-1, 3, and 1. The correct roots are identified as x=-1, 3, and 1/2. The second part of the problem involves substituting x=cos(t) into the equation, leading to the need to solve for cos(t)=-1 and cos(t)=1/2. This results in multiple solutions for t, with the possibility of complex solutions if cos(t)=3 is considered. The conversation highlights the importance of accurately finding roots and understanding trigonometric identities in solving equations.
Gughanath
Messages
118
Reaction score
0
The first part of this question was to find the roots of the equation 2x^3-5x^2-4x+3=0 i got x=-1, 3, and 1.

but then the second part completely confused me
b) Hence, by substituting x=cost solve the equation 2cos^3t-5cos^2t -4cost+3=0 for 0<t<2"pie", giving your answer in radians in terms of pie.

PLEASE HELP! :confused: :confused: :confused:
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Can you solve cos(t)=-1?

Oh, you've solve the cubic equation wrong, 1 of the solutions for x does not work.
 
Last edited:
Gughanath said:
giving your answer in radians in terms of pie.

PLEASE HELP!

The roots are : x=-1,3,1/2.

Just solve : cos(t)=-1 and cos(t)=1/2...this gives of course an infinity of real answers...

If you allow complex numbers, then you can solve cos(t)=3...

NB : You're great, with your help I know how the english pronounciation of \pi double explain it's origin :biggrin:
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top