I Trouble Solving an Equation that has square roots on both sides

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter thatboi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Roots Square
AI Thread Summary
To solve the equation A(-√(C²+4F₊) - C) = B(√(C²+4F₋) + C), the challenge lies in eliminating the square roots from both sides. The discussion reveals that by manipulating the equation and squaring both sides, one can simplify the problem, although it introduces additional complexity due to constants. The resulting polynomial form, αC⁴ + βC² + γ = 0, indicates that it can be approached using methods for solving quartic equations. Participants note that while the equation is complex, it remains solvable with careful algebraic manipulation. Overall, the equation presents a challenging but manageable problem for those familiar with polynomial equations.
thatboi
Messages
130
Reaction score
20
Hey all,
I am having trouble solving the following equation for C
$$A(-\sqrt{C^2+4F_{+}}-C) = B(\sqrt{C^2+4F_{-}}+C)$$
I don't know how to get ride of the square roots on both sides.
Any help would be appreciated, thanks!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
\begin{align*}
\sqrt{C^2+4F_{+}}&=D\sqrt{C^2+4F_{-}}+EC\\
C^2+4F_{+}&=D^2\left(C^2+4F_{-}\right)+E^2C^2+2DEC\sqrt{C^2+4F_{-}}\\
GC^2+H&=C\sqrt{C^2+4F_{-}}\\
G^2C^4+H^2+2GHC^2&=C^2(C^2+4F_{-})\\
\alpha C^4 + \beta C^2 +\gamma &=0
\end{align*}

Looks like some work to do because of the many constants, but doable.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes topsquark, bob012345, thatboi and 1 other person
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
22
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top