Trouble with a line in Goldstein

  • Thread starter Thread starter maverick_starstrider
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Goldstein Line
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a specific integral from Goldstein's work, where a discrepancy arises between the expected arcsin function and the arccos function presented. The integral in question is correctly evaluated, but the negative argument in the arccos function raises confusion. It is clarified that the difference between arcsin(-x) and arccos(x) can be reconciled by noting that the constant of integration can absorb a π/2 term. Additionally, the derivatives of both functions are shown to be equivalent, reinforcing the validity of the original equation. Understanding this relationship resolves the confusion regarding the integral's evaluation.
maverick_starstrider
Messages
1,118
Reaction score
7
Hey, I'm looking through Goldstein's and I'm looking at equation 3.51 where it basically says

\int \frac{dx}{\sqrt{\gamma x^2 + \beta x + \alpha}} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{-\gamma} } arccos \left( - \frac{\beta + 2 \gamma x}{\sqrt{\beta^2 - 4 \gamma \alpha} }\right)

Every integral book I look at says it should be what he gets except an arcsin function and the argument is positive not negative. but

arcsin(-x) \neq arccos(x)

What am I missing?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
maverick_starstrider said:
What am I missing?
You are missing \pi/2, which can be absorbed into the (unspecified) constant of integration.

Note that
\frac{d}{dx}\arccos(-x) = \frac{d}{dx}\arcsin(x) = \frac 1{\sqrt{1-x^2}}

and that
\arccos(-x) - \arcsin(x) = \frac{\pi}2
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...

Similar threads

Back
Top