Troubleshooting Accelerometers - Calibration Issues

  • Thread starter Thread starter czechman45
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Accelerometer
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the calibration of triaxial accelerometers, highlighting that different voltage readings occur based on the sensor's orientation, despite no actual acceleration. This raises concerns about the concept of acceleration, as the varying readings seem counterintuitive when the sensor is not accelerating but merely oriented differently. It is clarified that these readings are expected due to the influence of gravity, which the accelerometers measure in relation to their orientation. Once calibrated, the readings will indeed be orientation-specific, complicating applications with changing orientations. The equivalence principle indicates that distinguishing between acceleration and gravity can be fundamentally challenging in these scenarios.
czechman45
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Our lab just got these fancy new accelerometers that I'm trying to figure out. They are triaxial, but are not yet calibrated. As I was looking into how to calibrate them, I realized that, for a given axis, I would get a different voltage reading depending on whether the axis was oriented vertically (positive down), horizontally, or vertically (positive up). This is in fact how they recommend calibrating them.

Here's my problem. Doesn't this go against the whole idea of acceleration?! In each case, the sensor is not accelerating, it is just oriented differently, so why am I reading different values for the acceleration.

Also, does this mean that once the sensors are calibrated, that all of the readings I get will be orientation specific? If so, who is that dealt with? I would have a constantly changing orientation and no way to find euler angles.

Thanks for any help that you can give.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Are you accounting for gravity, and downward acceleration of 9.81 m/s^2?
 
Yes, each axis will give different readings depending on orientation, that is the whole purpose of a triaxial accelerometer. You can compute the 3D acceleration vector relative to the calibrated origin. If you only care about total magnitude of acceleration, then you can can to compute the length of the vector by sum of squares. total^2 = x^2 + y^2 + z^2
 
czechman45 said:
Here's my problem. Doesn't this go against the whole idea of acceleration?! In each case, the sensor is not accelerating, it is just oriented differently, so why am I reading different values for the acceleration.

Depending on your application, there may be fundamentally no solution to your problem. It's the equivalence principle that says acceleration and gravity are indistinguishable.
 
How did you find PF?: Via Google search Hi, I have a vessel I 3D printed to investigate single bubble rise. The vessel has a 4 mm gap separated by acrylic panels. This is essentially my viewing chamber where I can record the bubble motion. The vessel is open to atmosphere. The bubble generation mechanism is composed of a syringe pump and glass capillary tube (Internal Diameter of 0.45 mm). I connect a 1/4” air line hose from the syringe to the capillary The bubble is formed at the tip...
Thread 'Physics of Stretch: What pressure does a band apply on a cylinder?'
Scenario 1 (figure 1) A continuous loop of elastic material is stretched around two metal bars. The top bar is attached to a load cell that reads force. The lower bar can be moved downwards to stretch the elastic material. The lower bar is moved downwards until the two bars are 1190mm apart, stretching the elastic material. The bars are 5mm thick, so the total internal loop length is 1200mm (1190mm + 5mm + 5mm). At this level of stretch, the load cell reads 45N tensile force. Key numbers...
I'd like to create a thread with links to 3-D Printer resources, including printers and software package suggestions. My motivations are selfish, as I have a 3-D printed project that I'm working on, and I'd like to buy a simple printer and use low cost software to make the first prototype. There are some previous threads about 3-D printing like this: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/are-3d-printers-easy-to-use-yet.917489/ but none that address the overall topic (unless I've missed...
Back
Top