Troubleshooting Alternating Series: Rearranging & Applying L'Hopitals Rule

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on troubleshooting concepts related to alternating series and the application of L'Hôpital's Rule. The user is confused about the rearrangement of the limit involving the logarithm and how it leads to a simplification using properties of logarithms. Additionally, there is uncertainty regarding the derivative of the exponential function 2^(x-1), which can be found using the chain rule. The explanation clarifies that the derivative is ln(2)*2^(x-1), allowing for the application of L'Hôpital's Rule to evaluate the limit. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the importance of revisiting foundational concepts in algebra and calculus.
kdinser
Messages
335
Reaction score
2
Again, my rusty algebra and derivative taking is getting me into trouble.

This is from the section on alternating series. Overall, I think I'm getting the concepts, but some of the solutions to the problems are leaving me scratching my head.

\sum \frac{(-1)^{n+1}(n+1)}{ln(n+1)}

How did the solutions manual go from:

\lim_{n\rightarrow \infty}\frac{(-1)^{n+1}(n+1)}{ln(n+1)}

to this?
\lim_{n\rightarrow \infty}\frac{1}{1/(n+1)}

If someone could just tell me what concept they are using to rearrange this, I'd happily go look it up myself. I dug through my old algebra book and a second calc book and can't find anything like this.

Another problem that I'm having this morning is with an example problem in the same chapter.

They are applying L'Hopital's Rule to test for convergence

\lim_{n\rightarrow \infty}\frac{x}{2^{x-1}}

Again, looking back through past chapters, I can't find a single example of how to take the derivative of
2^{x-1}

I think I'm just forgetting something obvious here.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
kdinser said:
Again, looking back through past chapters, I can't find a single example of how to take the derivative of
2^{x-1}

I think I'm just forgetting something obvious here.
\frac{d}{dx} (a^x) = a^x ln(a)
 


First of all, don't worry about your rusty algebra and derivative skills. It's completely normal to forget some concepts over time and have to refresh your memory. The important thing is that you are trying to understand and learn.

Now, for the first problem, the solutions manual is using a property of logarithms: ln(a^b) = b*ln(a). Using this property, we can rewrite the denominator ln(n+1) as ln((n+1)^1). Then, we can use the power rule for logarithms to rewrite it as 1*ln(n+1). This allows us to cancel out the (n+1) in the numerator, leaving us with 1/ln(n+1). This is where the 1/(n+1) in the denominator comes from.

For the second problem, you are correct in thinking that we need to take the derivative of 2^{x-1}. This can be done using the chain rule, where we treat 2^{x-1} as the function and x-1 as the input. The derivative of 2^{x-1} is ln(2)*2^{x-1}. Then, we can apply L'Hopital's Rule to get the limit as x approaches infinity of ln(2)*2^{x-1}/1. Since the numerator and denominator both approach infinity, we can use L'Hopital's Rule again to get the limit as x approaches infinity of ln(2)^2*2^{x-1}/1. And since ln(2)^2 is a constant, we can simply ignore it and get the limit as x approaches infinity of 2^{x-1}/1. Finally, we can simplify this to the limit as x approaches infinity of 2^x.

I hope this helps clarify the solutions for you. Keep practicing and don't be afraid to ask for help when needed. Good luck!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top