Troubleshooting Phase Locked Loop Circuit with 3 ICs

  • Thread starter Thread starter MissP.25_5
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Loop Phase
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around troubleshooting a Phase Locked Loop (PLL) circuit involving three integrated circuits (ICs). The user is experiencing issues with the output signal not matching the expected frequency, which should be N+1 times the input frequency from the ELVIS function generator. Key suggestions include checking the free-running frequency of the Voltage-Controlled Oscillator (VCO) and ensuring proper connections, particularly for the 4046 chip. The user is advised to disconnect certain feedback connections to measure the VCO's oscillation frequency accurately. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding each chip's function and the need for hands-on testing to resolve the circuit's issues.
MissP.25_5
Messages
329
Reaction score
0
Hello,
I am in need of big help here. I don't know what else should be done to get this correct.
I have to build this PLL circuit and choose any 3 N (integer) of the N-divider. Then I have to observe the input signal Sig_in and the output signal VCO_out for each N. The result should be that the output frequency is N+1 times bigger than that of the frequency set by ELVIS (function generator), if I have understood the instructions correctly. I attached my results. The output signal looks weird, right? When I set N as 1, the output signal gets messed up :/ I tried for N= 4 and 8, the waveform looked just the same as when N=1. What should I do? By the way, where should I connect the 5th pin of IC 85 (A=B) to? In the diagram it just shows a short line not connecting to anything.

I took 4 pictures of different angles so you can see better. Click on the flickr links to see the pictures of my circuit.

NOTE: THE DIAGRAM IS IN THE PDF FILE PAGE 2.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/98820721@N04/11870437296/sizes/o/in/photostream/

http://www.flickr.com/photos/98820721@N04/11870033074/sizes/h/in/photostream/

http://www.flickr.com/photos/98820721@N04/11870445586/sizes/k/in/photostream/

http://www.flickr.com/photos/98820721@N04/11869882813/sizes/k/in/photostream/
 

Attachments

  • 2013.12.18.pdf
    2013.12.18.pdf
    120.4 KB · Views: 337
  • 1.JPG
    1.JPG
    74 KB · Views: 439
  • 2.JPG
    2.JPG
    69.8 KB · Views: 448
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi MissP. Can you attach a jpeg showing the schematic of your circuit? (I don't do pdfs.)
 
NascentOxygen said:
Hi MissP. Can you attach a jpeg showing the schematic of your circuit? (I don't do pdfs.)

There you go!
 

Attachments

  • PLL CIRCUIT.JPG
    PLL CIRCUIT.JPG
    31.1 KB · Views: 454
  • pll.JPG
    pll.JPG
    27.4 KB · Views: 446
The first step is to understand the function of each chip, so that you are able to then judge whether each is performing as expected. What do you understand is the function of the 393 chip? What does it do here?
 
NascentOxygen said:
The first step is to understand the function of each chip, so that you are able to then judge whether each is performing as expected. What do you understand is the function of the 393 chip? What does it do here?

The 393 chip serves as a counter. The 74hc393 counts only until the output count equals the setting of the ELVIS switches, I think. If you have A>B line connected to 74hc4046, then you have an output every time A>B.
 
First, we should check that the free-running frequency of the VCO is close to the designed value. Disconnect the wires from pins 14 and 3 of the 4046, and measure the frequency of its output (pin 4). Is this frequency close to what you were hoping for?

Did you design for a particular free-runnng frequency, or are you just using values for external R's and C's that you have been told to use?
 
NascentOxygen said:
First, we should check that the free-running frequency of the VCO is close to the designed value. Disconnect the wires from pins 14 and 3 of the 4046, and measure the frequency of its output (pin 4). Is this frequency close to what you were hoping for?

Did you design for a particular free-runnng frequency, or are you just using values for external R's and C's that you have been told to use?

I am just using values for external R's and C's that I have been told to use. What difference does that make? I actually run a VCO test before and here's the results.

Left side is V, right side is kHz. I have set the frequence between this range but I still didn't get the result I am hoping for!
 

Attachments

  • graf.JPG
    graf.JPG
    7.2 KB · Views: 454
When you have measured the free-running frequency, let me know what it is.

Also, what frequency Source Clock are you applying to pin 14 of the 4046? You attached 2 schematics,, identical except for that frequency.
 
NascentOxygen said:
When you have measured the free-running frequency, let me know what it is.

Also, what frequency Source Clock are you applying to pin 14 of the 4046? You attached 2 schematics,, identical except for that frequency.

How to check the free-running frequency? I set the reference frequency to 4kHz.
 
Last edited:
  • #10
MissP.25_5 said:
How to check the free-running frequency?
See post #6

I set the reference frequency to 4kHz.
Is that what is labelled Source Clock? Disconnect it, and disconnect other feedback, and the 4046 should oscillate by itself at its free-running frequency.

BTW, I'm curious to know what your lab instructions say is the goal of this demonstration? Can you quote what the notes say?
 
  • #11
NascentOxygen said:
See post #6


Is that what is labelled Source Clock? Disconnect it, and disconnect other feedback, and the 4046 should oscillate by itself at its free-running frequency.

BTW, I'm curious to know what your lab instructions say is the goal of this demonstration? Can you quote what the notes say?

Oh, sorry I missed post no.6.

Yes, that's the source clock.

The goal is to get the frequency of this circuit, that is "frequency from ELVIS x (N+1)" even if the waves are not fully locked.
 

Attachments

  • 1.jpg
    1.jpg
    77.3 KB · Views: 413
Last edited:
  • #12
Yes, disconnect from pin 3. Remove the function generator by pulling the wire from pin 14 (that's 14, not 4). Does the 4046 oscillate, if so, what is its frequency?

Does the blue wire from pin 4 go anywhere?

Do you have this board at home, or do you have to wait until you next go to school/college/uni before you can test changes to the setup?
 
  • #13
NascentOxygen said:
Yes, disconnect from pin 3. Remove the function generator by pulling the wire from pin 14 (that's 14, not 4). Does the 4046 oscillate, if so, what is its frequency?

Does the blue wire from pin 4 go anywhere?

Do you have this board at home, or do you have to wait until you next go to school/college/uni before you can test changes to the setup?

Yes, 14. I mis-wrote that. I don't have the board at home which is a big problem for me so I can't do any changes to the board yet. However, I did a VCO test before by connecting pin no 9 to the variable power source that ranges from 0 to 4 V. The frequency range at 0~4V was 289~528kHz
 
  • #14
There were 3 questions in my last post. Please address all.

In post #1 you attached two pics. Can you explain where these signals were found, what you don't like about them, and what you expected they would/should be.
 
  • #15
NascentOxygen said:
Yes, disconnect from pin 3. Remove the function generator by pulling the wire from pin 14 (that's 14, not 4). Does the 4046 oscillate, if so, what is its frequency?

Does the blue wire from pin 4 go anywhere?

Do you have this board at home, or do you have to wait until you next go to school/college/uni before you can test changes to the setup?

1. I haven't done that yet because I don't have the tools now. But doesn't the VCO test mean anything here? The result from the VCO test is in my previous post.

2. Yes, it is the VCO output to channel 2, it is also connected to Clock
 
  • #16
NascentOxygen said:
In post #1 you attached two pics. Can you explain where these signals were found, what you don't like about them, and what you expected they would/should be.
Also, what factor were you dividing by when the pics were taken?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
30
Views
6K