Troublesome infinities in physics

  • Thread starter Thread starter Akater
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics
AI Thread Summary
Physicists often encounter challenges when attempting to multiply generalized functions, such as the square of the Dirac delta function, which lacks a rigorous mathematical foundation. Examples of this issue can be found in both classical mechanics and field theory, where physically consistent solutions exist alongside unresolved problems. The discussion highlights the need for clarity in understanding the derivations of equations involving these functions. While the Dirac delta is technically a functional, its application in multiplication raises significant questions. Overall, the complexities of handling infinities in physics remain an important area of exploration.
Akater
Messages
14
Reaction score
4
Hello,

it is said that physicists sometimes need to multiply two generalized functions (square Dirac delta, for example) which makes little sense from the mathematical viewpoint. Could you please provide some examples where such an issue occurs?

Actually, I would be happy to see examples of two different kinds,

— those where (an empirical / magical) physically consistent solution is known;

— those which are still open problems.

I'd like to really understand the physics behind equations (their derivations, at least), but my physical background is not solid. So, please, if possible, don't stick to QFT problems. Classical mechanics / field theory / waves would be perfect. (Although, some example is definitely better than no example at all.)

________
Sorry for poor English.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
All such 'generalised' functions can be reformulated with mathematical rigour. The Dirac delta 'function', for instance, is really the Dirac delta functional.
 
Sure. I was talking about (supposed) situation when physicist need to multiply them and experience problems with the multiplication operation.
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
32
Views
443
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
390
Back
Top