True or False? (Complex Analysis)

Ted123
Messages
428
Reaction score
0
S is a star-shaped open subset of \mathbb{C}, f is a holomorphic function from S to \mathbb{C}, z_0 is an element of S.

I've just come out an exam and wondered whether the following 2 statements are true or false:

1 Let g be a holomorphic function on S \subseteq \mathbb{C}, with the exception of a pole of order N at z_0. If the Laurent Series of g around z_0 is

\displaystyle \sum_{n=-N}^{\infty} a_n ( z - z_0 )^n

for z \in D'(z_0, R) for some R>0 (and D(z_0 , R) \subseteq S) and constants a_n \in \mathbb{C}, then the residue of g at z_0 is given by a_{-1}.

2 Suppose S = D(z_0, R) for some R>0 and

\displaystyle f(z) = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} a_n(z-z_0)^n

for all z \in S and some constants a_n \in \mathbb{C}. Then necessarily a_0 = f(z_0) and a_n = f^{(n)}(z_0) for all n\geq 1.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1. How are the coefficients of the Laurent Series defined? (hint: it is related to the Cauchy Integral Formula)

2. Your function is holomorphic on S. So it is equal to its Taylor series on any point in its domain. What should the coefficients of a Taylor series centered at z_0 be?
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top