I Calculating Velocity: Moon Around Earth & Clocks in Burj Khalifa

Anakin Delabelle
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Sometimes I get so bored that I just try to calculate certain experiments I've heard without know the solution. Like using the basic formula to calculate the speed of the moon around the Earth. This time I tried to calculate the differences between 2 clocks, on put on the highest building in the world (Burj Khalifa) with 828m of the ground and one in its basement so 0m.

First of all, I went searching for some variables I need to use :
  • Rotation of the Earth = 23h 59min 04s = 86164 s
  • Radius of Earth = 6378 x 103 m
  • Speed of light = 299 792 458 m/s

I also found the formula I needed to use :


cd0ef0ab32cb75d24e1baca01106d02f0d0ae0bd


d047edd48fc8cbe8c6277b0115d66be121e46ed9

To find the Velocity, I used the simple formula
b5edc54db08559dc3e33cb3cc568126e12b46521
and
e463711972f03d38362b2a4f330ed8a9d4b172b9


So, I'm trying to find the velocity of those 2 clocks relative to the center of the earth. And because one clock is further (as we see in the formula, if the angular speed is constant) it would have a faster velocity so it should go faster in time.

Velocity clock basement :

gif.latex?v_%7B1%7D%3D%5Cfrac%7B2.%5Cpi%7D%7B86164s%7D%20.6378.10%5E3m%20%3D%20465.gif


Velocity clock on top :

f.latex?v_%7B2%7D%3D%5Cfrac%7B2.%5Cpi%7D%7B86164s%7D%20.%286378.10%5E3m+828m%29%20%3D%20465.gif


Then I chose for a timeframe of an hour = 3600s

That means I need to calculate the space they have done with their velocity :

gif.latex?x_%7B1%7D%3D%20465.0916379%5Cfrac%7Bm%7D%7Bs%7D.3600s%3D1674329.gif


gif.latex?x_%7B2%7D%3D%20465.1520167%5Cfrac%7Bm%7D%7Bs%7D.3600s%3D1674547.gif
Now we should have all the variables for the formula I first mentioned, so let's fill it in :D

For the clock in the basement :

5Cfrac%7Bm%7D%7Bs%7D%7D%7B%5Cleft%20%28%20299792458%5Cfrac%7Bm%7D%7Bs%7D%20%5Cright%20%29%5E2%7D.gif
gif.latex?3599%2C9999999956680s%20%3D%203600s%20-%204%2C33192.gif


So 4.33192 nanoseconds faster than the center of the earth.
Now for the clock on top :

5Cfrac%7Bm%7D%7Bs%7D%7D%7B%5Cleft%20%28%20299792458%5Cfrac%7Bm%7D%7Bs%7D%20%5Cright%20%29%5E2%7D.gif
gif.latex?3599%2C9999999956667s%20%3D%203600s%20-%204%2C33329.gif


So 4.33329 nanoseconds faster than the center of the earth.There seems to be a theoretical a difference of 1.37 picoseconds after 1h on the clocks.

First of all, this is my first time trying to solve such a question, I just graduated high school. But I'm really interested in this field of physics.

If I made a mistake somewhere I would love to hear it, also English grammar mistakes will be visible, my apologize for those also.

Have a great day further.
 

Attachments

  • gif.latex?v_%7B1%7D%3D%5Cfrac%7B2.%5Cpi%7D%7B86164s%7D%20.6378.10%5E3m%20%3D%20465.gif
    gif.latex?v_%7B1%7D%3D%5Cfrac%7B2.%5Cpi%7D%7B86164s%7D%20.6378.10%5E3m%20%3D%20465.gif
    1.5 KB · Views: 342
  • f.latex?v_%7B2%7D%3D%5Cfrac%7B2.%5Cpi%7D%7B86164s%7D%20.%286378.10%5E3m+828m%29%20%3D%20465.gif
    f.latex?v_%7B2%7D%3D%5Cfrac%7B2.%5Cpi%7D%7B86164s%7D%20.%286378.10%5E3m+828m%29%20%3D%20465.gif
    1.7 KB · Views: 353
  • gif.latex?x_%7B1%7D%3D%20465.0916379%5Cfrac%7Bm%7D%7Bs%7D.3600s%3D1674329.gif
    gif.latex?x_%7B1%7D%3D%20465.0916379%5Cfrac%7Bm%7D%7Bs%7D.3600s%3D1674329.gif
    1.5 KB · Views: 375
  • gif.latex?x_%7B2%7D%3D%20465.1520167%5Cfrac%7Bm%7D%7Bs%7D.3600s%3D1674547.gif
    gif.latex?x_%7B2%7D%3D%20465.1520167%5Cfrac%7Bm%7D%7Bs%7D.3600s%3D1674547.gif
    1.5 KB · Views: 387
  • 5Cfrac%7Bm%7D%7Bs%7D%7D%7B%5Cleft%20%28%20299792458%5Cfrac%7Bm%7D%7Bs%7D%20%5Cright%20%29%5E2%7D.gif
    5Cfrac%7Bm%7D%7Bs%7D%7D%7B%5Cleft%20%28%20299792458%5Cfrac%7Bm%7D%7Bs%7D%20%5Cright%20%29%5E2%7D.gif
    4.3 KB · Views: 332
  • gif.latex?3599%2C9999999956680s%20%3D%203600s%20-%204%2C33192.gif
    gif.latex?3599%2C9999999956680s%20%3D%203600s%20-%204%2C33192.gif
    1.5 KB · Views: 367
  • 5Cfrac%7Bm%7D%7Bs%7D%7D%7B%5Cleft%20%28%20299792458%5Cfrac%7Bm%7D%7Bs%7D%20%5Cright%20%29%5E2%7D.gif
    5Cfrac%7Bm%7D%7Bs%7D%7D%7B%5Cleft%20%28%20299792458%5Cfrac%7Bm%7D%7Bs%7D%20%5Cright%20%29%5E2%7D.gif
    4.2 KB · Views: 338
  • gif.latex?3599%2C9999999956667s%20%3D%203600s%20-%204%2C33329.gif
    gif.latex?3599%2C9999999956667s%20%3D%203600s%20-%204%2C33329.gif
    1.5 KB · Views: 386
Physics news on Phys.org
Anakin Delabelle said:
I also found the formula I needed to use :


cd0ef0ab32cb75d24e1baca01106d02f0d0ae0bd


d047edd48fc8cbe8c6277b0115d66be121e46ed9

The first formula relates the time of an event in two reference frames related by the Lorentz Transformation for a relative velocity ##v## in the x-direction, and isn't relevant here.

The second formula, for the gamma factor, is relevant here.

Note you you may also want to take gravitational time dilation into account. See:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_time_dilation

Note also that "moving clocks run slow" in your reference frame.

You may also be interested in the famous Hafele-Keating experiment:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hafele–Keating_experiment
 
Oh well, I've still got a lot to learn, but thanks for the referrals, I'll try to understand them :)
 
Anakin Delabelle said:
Oh well, I've still got a lot to learn, but thanks for the referrals, I'll try to understand them :)

I think gravitational time dilation is by far the greater factor in this case.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...
Back
Top