Trying to follow my textbook's explanation

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jamin2112
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Explanation
Jamin2112
Messages
973
Reaction score
12
I don't need the template because this isn't a homework problem, per se; it's just information about how to get started on my homework.

So I have an equation x'=Ax, x(0)=x0, where A is a constant matrix.

I can write it as x=ø(t)x0, where ø(t) is a fundamental matrix such that ø(0)=I

We know that Taylor expanding eat gives us ∑ antn/n!

(n starts from 1 and goes to infinity)

I + ∑Antn / n! = I + At + A2t2/2! + ... + Antn/n! + ... = e(At)

So, I don't even understand how you can raise a scalar to a power of a matrix. This is a messed-up world we live in.

d/dt e(At) = ∑Antn-1/(n-1)! = A[ I + ∑Antn/n!].

I don't understand that last step. Must be some property of summations?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
write out some terms (say the first 3) instead of just ∑...

it should become clear.
 
Jamin2112 said:
I don't need the template because this isn't a homework problem, per se; it's just information about how to get started on my homework.

So I have an equation x'=Ax, x(0)=x0, where A is a constant matrix.

I can write it as x=ø(t)x0, where ø(t) is a fundamental matrix such that ø(0)=I

We know that Taylor expanding eat gives us ∑ antn/n!

(n starts from 1 and goes to infinity)

I + ∑Antn / n! = I + At + A2t2/2! + ... + Antn/n! + ... = e(At)

So, I don't even understand how you can raise a scalar to a power of a matrix. This is a messed-up world we live in.
There is no "scalar to a power of a matrix" except on the far right. And that equation defines what is meant by e^A

d/dt e(At) = ∑Antn-1/(n-1)! = A[ I + ∑Antn/n!].

I don't understand that last step. Must be some property of summations?
\sum_{n=0}^\infty A^n t^{n-1}=A+ A^2t+ A^3t^2+ \cdot\cdot\cdot=A(I+ At+ A^2 t^2+ \cdot\cdot\cdot)= A(I+ \sum_{n=1}^\infty A^nt^n).
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top