Trying to invert an expression

  • Thread starter Thread starter Morberticus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Expression
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around inverting the expression n(k) = ∫ cos(k(x-y)) f(x,y) dxdy to obtain f(x,y). The original poster initially confused the notation and was corrected regarding the inclusion of k in the integral. A participant suggests that the transform resembles a "cosine transform" and provides a resource for further exploration. They also confirm that the inverse Fourier transform could be applicable in this context. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly identifying the transform type for successful inversion.
Morberticus
Messages
82
Reaction score
0
I've come across an expression that looks like

n(k) = ∫cos(x-y)f(x,y)dxdy

Is there a name for this transform? I would like to invert it to obtain f(x,y) but I'm not used to the 2D integral on the RHS. I tried to turn it into a Fourier transform:

n(k) = 1/2 ( ∫eixe-iyf(x,y)dxdy + ∫e-ixeiyf(x,y)dxdy)

but got stuck. Any help would be appreciated.

Thanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hi, there is something of strange, where is ##k## in the integral?, you say ##n(k)## but in the right side I don't see ##k##, and what is the domain of integration ?
 
You are right! Sorry, I forgot about the k when writing down the expression(s). The correct expression is

n(k) = ∫ cos( k(x-y) ) f(x,y) dxdy

Thanks
 
I think your transform is analogous to the ''cosine transform'', I hope you can find something useful here

http://dsp-book.narod.ru/TAH/ch03.pdf

but I think (as you wrote...) it is possible to use the inverse Fourier transform...
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top