Two coils, proving some equations

  • Thread starter Thread starter nothing19
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Coils
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around two parallel current-carrying coils positioned symmetrically about the origin on the x-axis, with the goal of determining conditions for a constant magnetic field near x=0. It is established that the first derivative of the magnetic field Bx with respect to x is zero due to the symmetric arrangement of the coils, regardless of the distance D. Additionally, the second derivative of Bx is also zero at x=0 when the coils are placed a specific distance apart, which needs to be expressed in terms of the radius R. The user attempts to derive the necessary equations but struggles with the implications of the hint regarding the adjustment of x. The conversation highlights the mathematical relationships involved in analyzing the magnetic field generated by the coils.
nothing19
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Imagine there are two parallel current-carrying coils, radius R, perpendicular to and centered on the x-axis, with centers at 0.5D and -0.5D. Both carry a current I in the same direction (clockwise). We would like to adjust D so that the magnetic field created by the coils is as constant as possible along the x-axis near x=0.

a) use equation 9.14 (below) to show the first derivative of Bx, with respect to x, is zero for all values of D just because of the arrangement of coils being symmetric about the origin.
b) If we place the coils a distance D apart, the second derivative of Bx will also be zero at X=0. Find this distance in terms of R.


Homework Equations



The equation is B=(2*pi*K*I*R^2) / ((c^2 (x^2 + R^2)^1.5))


The Attempt at a Solution


I had to derive that from the Biot-Savart law in a different problem. Anyway, if I recall, partial derivatives in respect to say X would be just like treating everything else a constant and X the only variable. In that case, I'd get constant 2piKIR^2/C^2...and then that multiplied by (X^2 + R^2)^-1.5. That derivative in terms of X would be
-3X / ((X^2 + R^2)^2.5).

B'=-6piKIR^2/(c^2*(x^2 + R^2)^2.5)).
A hint is given it might help to argue x should be replaced by X plus or minus 0.5D in this problem...but I don't see where that would help, especially in terms of computing the derivative.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
sorry to pester, but any ideas? thanks.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top