Two core regions with reflector

  • Thread starter Thread starter EricaS
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Core Reflector
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on solving for the eigenvalue and neutron flux distribution in a slab reactor with specified core and reflector parameters. The boundary conditions proposed include equal flux at the center of the core, equal flux at the core-reflector interface, equal gradient at the interface, and zero flux at the extrapolated boundary of the reflector. It is clarified that while fluxes at the interface do not need to be equal, the neutron currents must be continuous across regions. The need for additional boundary conditions related to current continuity is emphasized, highlighting the importance of incorporating different diffusion coefficients in each region. Properly addressing these conditions is essential for accurately solving the problem.
EricaS
Hello there

I'm working on this problem:
Solve numerically for the eigenvalue and neutron flux distribution in a slab reactor consisting of two adjacent core regions each of thickness 50 cm, with a 25-cm-thick reflector on each side. The nuclear parameters of the two core regions are (D = 0.65 cm,∑a = 0.12 cm−1, and ν∑f = 0.125 cm−1) and (D = 0.75 cm, ∑a = 0.10 cm−1, and ν∑f = 0.12 cm−1), and the parameters of the reflector are (D = 1.15 cm, ∑a = 0.01 cm−1, and ν∑f = 0.0 cm−1).
Solve this problem analytically and compare the answers.


Am I correct in saying that the boundary conditions are:
1. Flux at the center of the core region (between the two cores) is equal.
2. Flux at the core-reflector interface is equal.
3. Gradient of the flux at the core-reflector interface is equal.
4. Flux at the extrapolated boundary of the reflector is zero.

Have I correctly specified all the boundary conditions?
Or am I missing some?

Any help would be appreciated.

Thanks!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
EricaS said:
3. Gradient of the flux at the core-reflector interface is equal.
The current at the interface is equal, i.e., what leaves one volume must be entering the other volume across the common interface.

In a slab reactor, there is some plane between the surfaces where the current (or gradient in the flux) is zero, and the flux must be finite.

Fluxes in adjacent volumes to not have to be equal at the interface, but the currents must be equal.
 
If I understand the problem description, you have 4 regions.
Since this is a 2nd order differential equation, you need 2 boundary conditions (BC) per region, for a total of 8 BC.

You pointed out flux continuity between the regions. This gives you three BC.
You also pointed out the flux at the extrapolated distances. This give you two more BC.

What you are missing is the continuity of current between the regions. This will give you the final three BC.
You said "gradient", but it is actually the continuity of neutron current.
You have to include the different diffusion coefficients in each region.
 
Hello everyone, I am currently working on a burnup calculation for a fuel assembly with repeated geometric structures using MCNP6. I have defined two materials (Material 1 and Material 2) which are actually the same material but located in different positions. However, after running the calculation with the BURN card, I am encountering an issue where all burnup information(power fraction(Initial input is 1,but output file is 0), burnup, mass, etc.) for Material 2 is zero, while Material 1...
Hi everyone, I'm a complete beginner with MCNP and trying to learn how to perform burnup calculations. Right now, I'm feeling a bit lost and not sure where to start. I found the OECD-NEA Burnup Credit Calculational Criticality Benchmark (Phase I-B) and was wondering if anyone has worked through this specific benchmark using MCNP6? If so, would you be willing to share your MCNP input file for it? Seeing an actual working example would be incredibly helpful for my learning. I'd be really...
Back
Top