Two Dimensional Motion (Seemingly Simple)

AI Thread Summary
An object starts from rest and accelerates in the +x direction, covering 13.0 m between t=1.00 s and t=2.00 s. The correct acceleration is determined to be approximately 8.67 m/s², which can be derived using the displacement formula that accounts for the distance traveled in both time intervals. The initial velocity gained during the first second is crucial for accurately calculating the acceleration. A simpler approach involves using the difference in displacements over the two seconds to yield the correct result. The discussion emphasizes the importance of considering initial conditions and simplifying calculations for exam scenarios.
learnitall
Messages
10
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


An object starts from rest at time t=0.00 s and moves in the +x direction with constant acceleration. The object travels 13.0 m from time t=1.00s to time t=2.00 s. What is the acceleration of the object?
a) 5.20 m/s^2
b) 10.4 m/s^2
c) 8.67 m/s^2
d) 6.93 m/s^2
e) 12.1 m/s^2

The correct answer is c)

Homework Equations


1. v = v0 + at
2. x= x0 + v0t + 1/2 at
3 v2= v02 + 2a(Δx)
4 Δx= 1/2 (v + v0)t
5. vav-x = (x2 - x1)/(t2-t1)

The Attempt at a Solution


The problem says that the object starts from rest and assuming my system starts at zero i can use equation 2 to get:

13 m = 0 + 0 + 1/2 a (2)^2
which gives me:
a = 6.5 m/s^2

my next attempt was using the fact that the object traveled more than 13 m because we must take into account the distance traveled in the first second ( from t=0.00 s to t=1.00 s)

To solve for this distance which I called 'd' I tried using equation 2 3 and 4 by substituting 'x' for '13 + d'. Eventually I reach a point where i have to use quadratic formula to solve for 'd' and substitute it back into one of my chosen equations. It gets really complicated and I can't seem to find a nice answer for 'a'. Can anyone tell me what's a good way to solve for 'a'? My way seems too difficult to solve in 5 min (this was a question on an old exam). How do you get 8.67 m/s^2 for 'a'?!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
learnitall said:

Homework Statement


An object starts from rest at time t=0.00 s and moves in the +x direction with constant acceleration. The object travels 13.0 m from time t=1.00s to time t=2.00 s. What is the acceleration of the object?
a) 5.20 m/s^2
b) 10.4 m/s^2
c) 8.67 m/s^2
d) 6.93 m/s^2
e) 12.1 m/s^2

The correct answer is c)

Homework Equations


1. v = v0 + at
2. x= x0 + v0t + 1/2 at
3 v2= v02 + 2a(Δx)
4 Δx= 1/2 (v + v0)t
5. vav-x = (x2 - x1)/(t2-t1)

The Attempt at a Solution


The problem says that the object starts from rest and assuming my system starts at zero i can use equation 2 to get:

13 m = 0 + 0 + 1/2 a (2)^2
which gives me:
a = 6.5 m/s^2
Well you know that can't be right because the object is going to have some initial velocity when it begins the 13m portion of its trip, and the time taken to cover just that portion is not 2 seconds (what is it?).

my next attempt was using the fact that the object traveled more than 13 m because we must take into account the distance traveled in the first second ( from t=0.00 s to t=1.00 s)
More importantly you need to take into account the speed it gains during the first part of its trip! You really don't care how FAR it traveled in that first second since how far it traveled before doesn't matter to the only portion of the trajectory that is of interest: the final 13 meters.

To solve for this distance which I called 'd' I tried using equation 2 3 and 4 by substituting 'x' for '13 + d'. Eventually I reach a point where i have to use quadratic formula to solve for 'd' and substitute it back into one of my chosen equations. It gets really complicated and I can't seem to find a nice answer for 'a'. Can anyone tell me what's a good way to solve for 'a'? My way seems too difficult to solve in 5 min (this was a question on an old exam). How do you get 8.67 m/s^2 for 'a'?!

As I say, the initial distance doesn't matter; The speed vo when it begins the final 13m matters. Write an expression for the just the final part of the journey supposing that you know vo, Δs, and Δt. What's an expression for vo?
 
As I say, the initial distance doesn't matter; The speed vo when it begins the final 13m matters. Write an expression for the just the final part of the journey supposing that you know vo, Δs, and Δt. What's an expression for vo?

Sorry for the late response. I had classes all day and got caught up with other hw.

So I thought about what you said but instead of considering velocities I set up a simpler equation (after all this was an exam so there HAD to be easier way).

I considered displacement:
x(2)-x(1) = 13 m

1. 1/2 (a) (2 s)^2 - 1/2 (a) (1 s)^2 = 13 m

2. 2a - 1/2 a = 13

3. 3/2 a = 13

4. 3a = 26 m/s^2

5. a= 8.66 m/s^2
 
  • Like
Likes Yazeedzaid27
Yes, that works too. Quite elegant, in fact. :approve:
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top