I Two gravitational events might be a single lensed one

AI Thread Summary
The gravitational wave events GW170809 and GW170814 may represent a single event magnified by gravitational lensing, as they share similar parameters and originate from the same region in the sky. The authors suggest that many observed gravitational wave events could be influenced by lensing, indicating smaller, more distant sources consistent with known stellar black holes. The acoustic signatures of the two events show a close correlation, shifted by four days, supporting the lensing hypothesis. Future observation runs will help determine if more repetitions occur, which would reinforce this theory. The discussion highlights the challenges of identifying a lensing candidate due to poor localization and the need for more advanced measurements in future gravitational wave detections.
Messages
37,382
Reaction score
14,215
It has been proposed that the gravitational wave events GW170809 and GW170814 , named after their date (5 days difference) were actually a single one which appeared twice and magnified due to gravitational lensing. Both events have very similar parameters and come from the same area in the sky.

Twin LIGO/Virgo Detections of a Viable Gravitationally-Lensed Black Hole Merger

Some good discussion on reddit

More generally, the authors of the paper argue that most of the observed events could come from lensing. It would mean the sources are smaller - they would fit to the mass range of stellar black holes we know from other observations. It would also mean they are farther away. Due to the way LIGO/Virgo work we don't expect to see multiple images often, but they should still happen. Future observation runs will easily distinguish between these options. If we see more repetitions then this is probably the case, if not it is probably not.
 
  • Like
Likes OmCheeto, berkeman, eloheim and 5 others
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Wouldn’t their acoustic signatures correlate closely but shifted in time if they were from the same source?
 
That's what they see. Very similar signals, just shifted by 4 days.
 
  • Like
Likes jedishrfu
mfb said:
That's what they see. Very similar signals, just shifted by 4 days.
Has there been a search done for a viable lensing candidate?
 
I haven't seen anything. Without an optical component the localization is not good, probably too many galaxies in range.
 
mfb said:
I haven't seen anything. Without an optical component the localization is not good, probably too many galaxies in range.
Not to give up just yet, all is not lost - With their approximate angular separation plus that five day time difference it should be possible to come up with an approximate mass and distance to the lensing object and so have an idea of what they're looking for and where!
 
The localization just gives a rough direction in the sky. There is no significant (!) angular separation between the events.

A binary neutron star merger with an optical component would be great in future measurements.
 
  • Like
Likes alantheastronomer
mfb said:
The localization just gives a rough direction in the sky. There is no significant (!) angular separation between the events.

A binary neutron star merger with an optical component would be great in future measurements.
Oops, I forgot they were found using only two detectors...
 
Three detectors (2*LIGO and VIRGO), at least the second one, but the possible area is still 90 square degrees (340 for the other event).
 
Back
Top