Calculating Maximum Height of a Hanging Block on a Pulley System

  • Thread starter Thread starter jphillip
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Blocks Pully
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the maximum height reached by a 2.2 kg block in a pulley system with a 3.2 kg block. Participants explore the correct formulas for determining acceleration and velocity, emphasizing the importance of using conservation of energy principles. The initial calculations involve finding the acceleration using the difference in weights and then determining the velocity as the heavier block falls. There is some confusion about the use of squared values and the correct application of formulas. Ultimately, the conversation highlights the need for a solid understanding of physics principles to solve such problems effectively.
jphillip
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
two blocks (2.2kg and 3.2kg) both hanging 1.80 m from the ground on a pulley(massless / frictionless) that is 4.80 m from the ground.

What is the maximum height the smaller block (2.2kg) reaches, when the system is released?

It appears that I need to find its velocity first of the system as the 3.2kg falls 1.8 m to the ground.
(3.2kg-2.2kg) / (3.2kg+2.2kg) = .185g * (9.8m/s2) = 1.81 m/s2

Then once the big block hits the ground, calc the additional height of the little block will rise additionally from the velocity created.

v2 - v2i / 2 (g)
1.812 / 2(9.8 m/s2) = .168 m + 1.8m (initial drop / increase)

Is this correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
welcome to pf!

hi jphillip! welcome to pf! :smile:
jphillip said:
(3.2kg-2.2kg) / (3.2kg+2.2kg) = .185g * (9.8m/s2) = 1.81 m/s2

where did you get this formula from? :confused:

(it's only partly correct :redface:)

(your second formula is fine)
 
I got the first forumla from an example in my book that appeared to be calculating what I thought I needed. An elevator question, what did I miss or am I missing
 
thought so! :rolleyes:

always work out the formula yourself :wink:

what should it be? :smile:
 
I believe F = ma which worked out a = F/m
So
3.2kg - 2.2kg = 1kg * 9.8 = F
(3.2 + 2.2) = m ? (not sure here)

I think
 
jphillip said:
I believe F = ma …

well, that certainly would work, but you want v not a …

so it's quicker to use conservation of energy :wink:
 
O.K.

V2 = 2(1.81m/s2)(1.80m)
 
jphillip said:
O.K.

V2 = 2(1.81m/s2)(1.80m)

yes! :biggrin:
 
So that gets me the velocity2 I would then have to solve for the additional distance correct
 
  • #10
yes :smile:

(same method as you used at the start)
 
  • #11
\sqrt{2*1.81*1.80} = v = 2.55

2.552 / (2*9.8m/s2) = y = .332 + 3.6 (1.80(starting height)+1.80 accl height)

total height 3.93m
 
  • #12
i'm finding it difficult to follow this without any formulas :redface:

(and why did you bother to square-root that, when you were only going to square it again immediately after? :confused:)
 
  • #13
Here are the formulas that I have used... initial height = 1.80m
N - Newtons
kg - kilograms
(Block 1 31.31N - Block 2 21.56N) / (block 1 3.3kg + block 2 2.2kg) = a

So
(31.36N - 21.56N) / (3.2kg + 2.2kg) = 1.8148 m/s2

Then solve for Velocity using v2 = v2i + 2a(y)

V2= 0 + 2(1.8148m/s2)(1.80) = 6.5338 which is velocity not squared

Now solve for the actual distance using the same formula on
v = 6.5338 (not squared from above)
a = 9.8 gravity
v / 2(a) = y

6.5338 / 2(9.8) = .332 which should be the height of the lighter block 2.2kg with momentum after the 3.2 kg block hits the ground.
 
  • #14
hi jphillip! :smile:

(just got up :zzz: …)

i think you have the correct result, but what do you mean by "not squared"? :confused:

that 6.53338 is v2

have you done conservation of energy in class (KE + PE = constant)?

you can avoid finding the acceleration by using mgh - Mgh = (m + M)v2/2
 
  • #15
I have not made it to conservation of energy in Class. Thanks for the help I am sure I will be back for more. I am really enjoying this class, just not the summer version of I believe LOL.
 
  • #16
jphillip said:
I have not made it to conservation of energy in Class.

ok, that's something to look forward to! :biggrin:

just to recap, your equations (without conservation of energy) should have been

(F = ma): mg - T = ma, Mg - T = -Ma, so (subtracting) (m-M)g = (m+M)a, or a = (m-M)/(m+M)

v2 = 2as1

v2 = 2gs2 :wink:
 
Back
Top