Calculating Distance Between Two Joggers on a Run

  • Thread starter Thread starter cvc121
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Two joggers start from the same point, with one running 2.0 km north and 3.0 km east, while the other runs 4.0 km south and 1.0 km west. The discussion focuses on calculating the distance between the two joggers after their runs. It is suggested that using Cartesian coordinates simplifies the calculation, allowing for direct addition and subtraction of the joggers' position vectors. The correct final positions are identified as r1 = (3, 2) and r2 = (-1, -4), leading to a straightforward calculation of the distance. Overall, the conversation emphasizes efficiency in solving the problem by minimizing unnecessary steps.
cvc121
Messages
61
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Two joggers start their run at the same starting point. One jogger runs 2.0km north and then turns to the east and runs an additional 3.0km. The second jogger initially heads south and runs 4.0km before turning to the west and runs another 1.0km. How far apart are the two joggers once they are done?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


My attempt at the solution is below. Can anyone verify my work to see if it is correct? If not, where did I go wrong?
 

Attachments

  • 20151108_165142[1].jpg
    20151108_165142[1].jpg
    31.5 KB · Views: 338
Physics news on Phys.org
Try to draw all jogging paths in one graphic and look whether you can produce symmetries. It'll shorten your calculation to 2 lines.
 
Your result is correct. But if I may suggest, you've taken a rather complicated way to get there by going through conversions to polar form and all the trig it entails.

If you stick to Cartesian representation of the vectors for the calculations it would go much easier. Then you can add or subtract the components directly, and at the end find the magnitude. For example, if you let a vector r = (x,y) represent a jogger's position when he finishes his trek, where x is the east-west direction component and y the north-south direction component, both in km, then for the two joggers:

r1 = (3, 2) which represents {3 km east, 2 km north}
r2 = (-1, -4) which represents {1 km west, 4 km south}

It's then a simple matter to form r = r1 - r2, a vector from jogger 2 to jogger 1, and find the magnitude of r.
 
Looks good, but you went through a lot of steps when instead you just needed the last four steps because the x and y components of A and B can be determined without those earlier steps.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top