Two level system Schrodinger Equation problem

TheDestroyer
Messages
401
Reaction score
1
Hello guys,

in the attached file, I can't understand how the guy arrived to the equation in the red rectangle.

My problem is: how could there not be dC2/dt term. Why only dC1/dt term?
ψ contains both C1 and C2, and when the derivative is applied, both have to be influenced, and both are functions of time. Why does C2 disappear?

Could someone please explain how this last step is exactly taken?

Thank you for any efforts.
 

Attachments

  • 1.jpg
    1.jpg
    29.8 KB · Views: 467
Physics news on Phys.org
Because it had been something like (dC1/dt) ψ1 + (dC2/dt) ψ2. But then he says "multiply by ψ1* and integrate over all space." Well, ∫ψ11 dx = 1 so you don't see it explicitly in the result, just dC1/dt is left in the first term. But ∫ψ12 dx = 0, by orthogonality, so the dC2/dt term drops out completely.
 
Got it. Thanks man :)
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top