Are These Modern Physics Books Worth Reading?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the value of George Gamov's books "Mr Tompkins in Paperback" and "One, Two, Three... Infinity" in making complex modern physics concepts accessible. Both books are praised for their entertaining approach, effectively introducing ideas like special and general relativity, quantum physics, and four-dimensional space to readers. While "One, Two, Three... Infinity" is highlighted as particularly engaging, it is noted that these works serve more as entertaining introductions rather than comprehensive educational resources. They are suitable for a general audience interested in physics, rather than strictly for undergraduate students, as they focus on illustrating the intriguing aspects of quantum and relativistic phenomena without delving deeply into the technicalities of the subjects.
ramollari
Messages
433
Reaction score
1
What do you think on the value of these two entertaining books on Modern Physics by George Gamov: "Mr Tompkins in paperback" and "One, Two, Three...Infinity". They make the modern concepts like special and general relativity, quantum physics, 4D space, etc., very understandable for beginners.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I hear "One, Two, Three... Infinity" is a great read. Although i haven't read it myself.

What level of beginner is this? Beginner as in Undergraduate Study, or as in anyone interested?
 
The Mister Tomkins books are entertaining introductions. They won't teach you any real SR or QM but they make real the quantum and relativistic weirdness.
 
The book is fascinating. If your education includes a typical math degree curriculum, with Lebesgue integration, functional analysis, etc, it teaches QFT with only a passing acquaintance of ordinary QM you would get at HS. However, I would read Lenny Susskind's book on QM first. Purchased a copy straight away, but it will not arrive until the end of December; however, Scribd has a PDF I am now studying. The first part introduces distribution theory (and other related concepts), which...
I've gone through the Standard turbulence textbooks such as Pope's Turbulent Flows and Wilcox' Turbulent modelling for CFD which mostly Covers RANS and the closure models. I want to jump more into DNS but most of the work i've been able to come across is too "practical" and not much explanation of the theory behind it. I wonder if there is a book that takes a theoretical approach to Turbulence starting from the full Navier Stokes Equations and developing from there, instead of jumping from...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
11
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
5K
Back
Top