Two objects connected by a cord, with a pulley.

  • Thread starter Thread starter budd99
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pulley
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving two objects connected by a cord over a pulley, with one mass being unknown. The system accelerates 50 cm in 1 second, leading to a calculated acceleration of 0.5 m/s². Participants debate the application of formulas, noting that modeling the scenario as an Atwood machine is inappropriate due to the incline being vertical. Confusion arises regarding the forces acting on the masses and the need to account for tension in the cord. Ultimately, the conversation highlights the importance of deriving equations from first principles rather than relying solely on standard formulas.
budd99
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The system shown (attached image) is released from rest and moves 50 cm in 1.0 s. What is the value of M? All surfaces are frictionless.

a. 0.42 kg
b. 0.34 kg
c. 0.50 kg
d. 0.59 kg
e. 0.68 kg


Homework Equations



Since the incline is 90 degress, I am trying to model this as an Atwood machine.

I don't understand how there can be any acceleration if the mass that we need to find is smaller than 3kg.

The Attempt at a Solution



moves 50cm in 1s., which means a is 0.5m/s2

So, using the formula
a = (m2 -m1)/(m1 + m2)g

0.5 = (m2 - 3)(3 + m2)9.80

m2 = 3.32

Which is not in the solution
 

Attachments

  • pulley.jpg
    pulley.jpg
    4.1 KB · Views: 799
Physics news on Phys.org
budd99 said:
Since the incline is 90 degress, I am trying to model this as an Atwood machine.
Not a good idea, since an Atwood machine has both ends of the string vertical.

I don't understand how there can be any acceleration if the mass that we need to find is smaller than 3kg.
Why do you think this?


moves 50cm in 1s., which means a is 0.5m/s2
No. Use kinematics to determine the acceleration.

So, using the formula
a = (m2 -m1)/(m1 + m2)g
Instead of using a canned formula (which happens not to apply in this case), derive your own from first principles. Apply Newton's 2nd law to each mass.
 
Ok, I used 0.5 = 0 + 0.5a12 to find a, which gives 1.

So, if F = ma, then the F on the 3kg block is 3(1) which is 3.

On the block suspended in air, the F = mg.

Since we already found F = 3, then 3 = m(9.8), and finally m = .31

This still doesn't make sense, maybe I'm forgetting a T somewhere?
 
budd99 said:
This still doesn't make sense, maybe I'm forgetting a T somewhere?
Exactly. Two forces act on the hanging mass.

(Also, from the diagram I can't read the mass of the sliding block. Is it 3 kg or 30 kg?)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
7K
Replies
5
Views
5K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Back
Top