Two observers must agree what each clock reads....

AI Thread Summary
In the discussion, the main focus is on understanding the relativistic effects of time dilation and synchronization of clocks in different frames of reference. The observer moving at high speed perceives the stationary clocks X and Y as ticking slower, yet when passing over clock Y, they find it reads a later time than their own clock. This apparent contradiction arises because synchronized clocks in the ground frame are not synchronized in the moving observer's frame due to the effects of special relativity. The key realization is that while the observer sees the clocks ticking slowly, they must account for the fact that clock Y is ahead in their frame when they pass over it. Ultimately, the discussion highlights the complexities of reconciling observations between different inertial frames.
Phynos
Messages
31
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement


You are gliding over Earth's surface at a high speed, carrying your high-precision clock. At points X and Y on the ground are similar clocks, synchronized in the ground frame of reference. As you pass over clock X, it and your clock both read 0.

(a) According to you, do clocks X and Y advance slower or faster than yours?

(b) When you pass over clock Y, does it read the same time, an earlier time, or a later time than yours? (Make sure your answer agrees with what ground observers should see)

(c) Reconcile any seeming contradictions between your answers to part (a) and (b).

Homework Equations



Lo = L/γ

t' = γ(t - vx/c2)
or Δt' = Δt/γ

γ = (1-u2/c2)-1/2

The Attempt at a Solution



(a) Clocks moving in your (inertial) frame of reference appear to be ticking slower than clocks stationary in your frame. So the clocks X and Y appear to advance slower.

(b) This is where I get confused. I see clocks X and Y running slowly, although an observer in that frame observes my clocks running more slowly.

Say I'm traveling at (31/2/2)c so γ is 2, the observers on the ground measure my journey from above X to above Y to be t0. So when I pass over clock Y, they observe clock Y to be t0. (Since we should agree, I should also see t0, yet from the reasoning below I don't)

They observe my clocks running half as fast, thus my clock only reads t0/2 when I am above clock Y.

For me, the length of my journey is shorter due to length contraction. So in their frame I travel (t0) / (31/2/2c) or (2t0c) / (31/2), but in mine I travel half that. So my clock does register t0/2 due to the path being half as long. That part makes sense (I think?).

Yet they appear slowed to me, by a factor of 2, from this I can conclude their clock should read t0/4! That makes no sense. My reasoning is twisted somewhere.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are given that clocks X and Y are synchronized in the Earth frame. Are X and Y also synchronized in your frame?
 
TSny said:
You are given that clocks X and Y are synchronized in the Earth frame. Are X and Y also synchronized in your frame?

Synchronized clocks that are stationary in one frame should not be synchronized in a frame in which they are moving. You probably asked that so I'd have some insight that would fix my issue, but I can't think of it...

How can I apply that understanding to make sense of my fault? I'm failing to problem solve effectively within the framework of special relativity.

As far as I'm concerned in the spaceship, clock Y should be ahead of clock X?

...Because if we had an observer on the ground and a light pulse was emitted from each clock at t=0, he would say they arrive at the same time. Since the arrival of both is a single event, I must agree. However what I observe is the observer on the ground (and the clocks) moving along the vector that connects clock Y to X. Since the observer is gaining on the signal from X while receding from the signal from Y, I must observe Y emit the signal sooner so they reach him at the same time, thus it's time is further ahead.
 
Last edited:
Phynos said:
Synchronized clocks that are stationary in one frame should not be synchronized in a frame in which they are moving. You probably asked that so I'd have some insight that would fix my issue, but I can't think of it...

How can I apply that understanding to make sense of my fault? I'm failing to problem solve effectively within the framework of special relativity.

As far as I'm concerned in the spaceship, clock Y should be ahead of clock X?

...Because if we had an observer on the ground and a light pulse was emitted from each clock at t=0, he would say they arrive at the same time. Since the arrival of both is a single event, I must agree. However what I observe is the observer on the ground (and the clocks) moving along the vector that connects clock Y to X. Since the observer is gaining on the signal from X while receding from the signal from Y, I must observe Y emit the signal sooner so they reach him at the same time, thus it's time is further ahead.
Yes. So, at the instant you pass X, what does clock Y display simultaneously (according to you)?
 
  • Like
Likes Phynos
TSny said:
Yes. So, at the instant you pass X, what does clock Y display simultaneously (according to you)?

Ohhh so Y is ahead by t0 minus the trip time (In my FOR). That's the key! Wow I really should have picked up on that.

(b) It reads a later time.

(c) In my frame of reference t != 0 at Y, t > 0, which explains why even though I see their clocks tick at a slower rate, the clock at Y is ahead of my own when I am above it.

Thanks for the help.
 
OK. Good work!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top