Two observers must agree what each clock reads....

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves two observers with synchronized clocks, one on the ground (clocks X and Y) and one moving at high speed (the original poster's clock). The discussion centers around the perceived time readings of these clocks as the moving observer passes over them, exploring concepts from special relativity.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to analyze the time dilation effects on the ground clocks as perceived from their moving frame. They express confusion about the relationship between the readings of their clock and the ground clocks when passing over them.
  • Some participants question whether the synchronization of clocks X and Y in the ground frame holds true in the moving observer's frame, suggesting that this could clarify the original poster's reasoning.
  • Others explore the implications of light signals emitted from the clocks and how their arrival times are perceived by the moving observer, raising questions about simultaneity in different frames.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights and clarifications regarding the synchronization of clocks in different reference frames. The original poster has made progress in understanding the implications of their observations but continues to seek clarity on specific points.

Contextual Notes

There is an emphasis on the effects of relative motion on the perception of time and synchronization, with participants grappling with the implications of special relativity and the nature of simultaneity.

Phynos
Messages
31
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement


You are gliding over Earth's surface at a high speed, carrying your high-precision clock. At points X and Y on the ground are similar clocks, synchronized in the ground frame of reference. As you pass over clock X, it and your clock both read 0.

(a) According to you, do clocks X and Y advance slower or faster than yours?

(b) When you pass over clock Y, does it read the same time, an earlier time, or a later time than yours? (Make sure your answer agrees with what ground observers should see)

(c) Reconcile any seeming contradictions between your answers to part (a) and (b).

Homework Equations



Lo = L/γ

t' = γ(t - vx/c2)
or Δt' = Δt/γ

γ = (1-u2/c2)-1/2

The Attempt at a Solution



(a) Clocks moving in your (inertial) frame of reference appear to be ticking slower than clocks stationary in your frame. So the clocks X and Y appear to advance slower.

(b) This is where I get confused. I see clocks X and Y running slowly, although an observer in that frame observes my clocks running more slowly.

Say I'm traveling at (31/2/2)c so γ is 2, the observers on the ground measure my journey from above X to above Y to be t0. So when I pass over clock Y, they observe clock Y to be t0. (Since we should agree, I should also see t0, yet from the reasoning below I don't)

They observe my clocks running half as fast, thus my clock only reads t0/2 when I am above clock Y.

For me, the length of my journey is shorter due to length contraction. So in their frame I travel (t0) / (31/2/2c) or (2t0c) / (31/2), but in mine I travel half that. So my clock does register t0/2 due to the path being half as long. That part makes sense (I think?).

Yet they appear slowed to me, by a factor of 2, from this I can conclude their clock should read t0/4! That makes no sense. My reasoning is twisted somewhere.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are given that clocks X and Y are synchronized in the Earth frame. Are X and Y also synchronized in your frame?
 
TSny said:
You are given that clocks X and Y are synchronized in the Earth frame. Are X and Y also synchronized in your frame?

Synchronized clocks that are stationary in one frame should not be synchronized in a frame in which they are moving. You probably asked that so I'd have some insight that would fix my issue, but I can't think of it...

How can I apply that understanding to make sense of my fault? I'm failing to problem solve effectively within the framework of special relativity.

As far as I'm concerned in the spaceship, clock Y should be ahead of clock X?

...Because if we had an observer on the ground and a light pulse was emitted from each clock at t=0, he would say they arrive at the same time. Since the arrival of both is a single event, I must agree. However what I observe is the observer on the ground (and the clocks) moving along the vector that connects clock Y to X. Since the observer is gaining on the signal from X while receding from the signal from Y, I must observe Y emit the signal sooner so they reach him at the same time, thus it's time is further ahead.
 
Last edited:
Phynos said:
Synchronized clocks that are stationary in one frame should not be synchronized in a frame in which they are moving. You probably asked that so I'd have some insight that would fix my issue, but I can't think of it...

How can I apply that understanding to make sense of my fault? I'm failing to problem solve effectively within the framework of special relativity.

As far as I'm concerned in the spaceship, clock Y should be ahead of clock X?

...Because if we had an observer on the ground and a light pulse was emitted from each clock at t=0, he would say they arrive at the same time. Since the arrival of both is a single event, I must agree. However what I observe is the observer on the ground (and the clocks) moving along the vector that connects clock Y to X. Since the observer is gaining on the signal from X while receding from the signal from Y, I must observe Y emit the signal sooner so they reach him at the same time, thus it's time is further ahead.
Yes. So, at the instant you pass X, what does clock Y display simultaneously (according to you)?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Phynos
TSny said:
Yes. So, at the instant you pass X, what does clock Y display simultaneously (according to you)?

Ohhh so Y is ahead by t0 minus the trip time (In my FOR). That's the key! Wow I really should have picked up on that.

(b) It reads a later time.

(c) In my frame of reference t != 0 at Y, t > 0, which explains why even though I see their clocks tick at a slower rate, the clock at Y is ahead of my own when I am above it.

Thanks for the help.
 
OK. Good work!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
5K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K