Two-orbital system w/ tight-binding and Coulomb interaction

phys_student1
Messages
104
Reaction score
0
We have a system of two orbitals 'a' and 'b'. The Hamiltonian is given as:

$$H=\sum_{\sigma=\uparrow,\downarrow}(\epsilon_a A_\sigma^\dagger A_\sigma+\epsilon_b B_\sigma^\dagger B_\sigma) -t\sum_{\sigma=\uparrow,\downarrow}(A_\sigma^\dagger B_\sigma+B_\sigma^\dagger A_\sigma)+U B_\uparrow^\dagger B_\uparrow B_\downarrow^\dagger B_\downarrow$$
The first term represent the energy of both electrons (will be ignored, it only shifts the zero-level), second term represent the hopping while third one the Coulomb interaction between electrons in orbital 'b'. A's and B's are the creation and annihilation operators. Initially we have 1 spin-up and 1 spin-down electrons in the system. In the limit U>>t, we are to find the ground state and its energy.

I have represented H as the following matrix:

$$H=\begin{pmatrix}
0 & 0 & -t & -t \\
0 & 0 & +t & +t \\
-t & +t & U & 0 \\
-t & +t & 0 & 0 \end{pmatrix} $$
with basis vector:
$$\begin{pmatrix}
\left|\uparrow,\downarrow\right> \\
\left|\downarrow,\uparrow\right> \\
\left|\uparrow\downarrow,.\right> \\
\left|.,\uparrow\downarrow\right> \end{pmatrix} $$
This system can be diagonalized and solved exactly, although the solution is cumbersome. Alternatively, in U>>t limit, we can 'downfold' the Hamiltonian and solve as:
$$H_{eff}=\begin{pmatrix}
-t & -t \\
t & t \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix}
-1/U & 0 \\
0 & 0 \end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix}
-t & t \\
-t & t \end{pmatrix} = -t^2/U \begin{pmatrix}
1 & -1 \\
-1 & 1 \end{pmatrix}$$
Which gives the solution as: $$E_1=-2t^2/U, E_2=0$$. Eigen-functions can be obtained straightforwardly.

Now, if I am to use second quantization, then the Hamiltonian becomes:
$$H_{eff}=-2t^2/U(A_\uparrow^\dagger B_\downarrow^\dagger B_\downarrow A_\uparrow - A_\downarrow^\dagger B_\uparrow^\dagger B_\downarrow A_\uparrow - A_\uparrow^\dagger B_\downarrow^\dagger B_\uparrow A_\downarrow + A_\downarrow^\dagger B_\uparrow^\dagger B_\uparrow A_\downarrow )$$
I have tried to write it down in terms of the spin operators, which gave me a compact representation:
$$H_{eff}=2t^2/U(S_a.S_b - n_a.n_b/4)$$
Then how would one normally proceed to get the eigenvalues / functions?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Another point...If you have your perturbing Hamiltonian in 2nd quantization representation, and your wave functions are also in 2nd Q. rep. Then how would one find the 2nd order perturbation theory, since you will have some thing like <c*c...|c*c...|c*c...> , I mean, everything is in terms of creation and annihilation operators and I do not see how one can proceed in this representation?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Back
Top