Two Point Source Interference pattern

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding the finite number of nodal lines in two-point source interference patterns. Despite initial beliefs that there could be infinite nodal lines, it is clarified that the path difference between the two sources determines the locations of these lines, resulting in a finite number of intersections. The concept of ideal waves, which do not lose energy, supports the idea of fixed nodal lines along the straight line segment connecting the sources. The realization comes from analyzing the geometry of the setup and the specific conditions for destructive interference. Ultimately, the conclusion is reached that there are indeed a finite number of nodal lines in this interference pattern.
John H
Messages
36
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Studying physics in High school, and for two years now we have covered two point source interference patterns with light, sound, and water wave in a ripple tank per say. The type of wave nor medium is necessary significant for me at the moment, but I am having trouble understanding something about the interference pattern, the shape and spreading of nodal, and anti nodal lines.

http://www.physicsclassroom.com/class/light/u12l3b.cfm

like ones depicted in above site. I Have at moment at my availability 3 different textbooks which all state that indeed there is a fixed number of nodal lines, and I always though there would be an infinite number of nodal lines, I know this isn't that important, but I just don't see why there wouldn't be many nodal line (Lines of destructive interference present), I know waves diminish, they spread losing energy and thus amplitude, but say they didn't which is what my books assume, why wouldn't there be infinite many nodal lines.

Also, sources are in phase, and nothing is changing over time.

Homework Equations


No real relevant equations I know of, just the concepts.

The Attempt at a Solution


I though it had something to do with loss of energy as stated above, but books are talking about ideal waves, which don't seem to lose energy.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
yes, if you take your space to be infinitely large, there will be infinite number of nodes antinodes (& everything in between).
 
John H said:

Homework Statement


Studying physics in High school, and for two years now we have covered two point source interference patterns with light, sound, and water wave in a ripple tank per say. The type of wave nor medium is necessary significant for me at the moment, but I am having trouble understanding something about the interference pattern, the shape and spreading of nodal, and anti nodal lines.

http://www.physicsclassroom.com/class/light/u12l3b.cfm

like ones depicted in above site. I Have at moment at my availability 3 different textbooks which all state that indeed there is a fixed number of nodal lines, and I always though there would be an infinite number of nodal lines, I know this isn't that important, but I just don't see why there wouldn't be many nodal line (Lines of destructive interference present), I know waves diminish, they spread losing energy and thus amplitude, but say they didn't which is what my books assume, why wouldn't there be infinite many nodal lines.
To start, just consider the straight line segment joining the 2 sources. You could work out how many nodal lines pass through that segment, using the fact that the path difference to the sources is (n+½) times the wavelength. That's just a finite number of points on that segment, through which the nodal lines intersect.

Next consider the rest of the straight line joining the 2 sources -- not the segment in between, but the parts of the line on either side of the source points. How many points on that line have a path difference of (n+½) times the wavelength?

The end result is a finite number of nodal lines.
 
Redbelly98 said:
To start, just consider the straight line segment joining the 2 sources. You could work out how many nodal lines pass through that segment, using the fact that the path difference to the sources is (n+½) times the wavelength. That's just a finite number of points on that segment, through which the nodal lines intersect.

Next consider the rest of the straight line joining the 2 sources -- not the segment in between, but the parts of the line on either side of the source points. How many points on that line have a path difference of (n+½) times the wavelength?

The end result is a finite number of nodal lines.

Thanks, now that I think about its pretty obvious that there is finite nodal lines.
 
vvvv
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top