Two protons colide and i am to calculate newly formed mass

  • Thread starter Thread starter 71GA
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass Protons
71GA
Messages
208
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Two protons with kinetic energies ##W_{k1}=4GeV## and ##W_{k2}=2GeV## colide and form new particles. What is the mass of newly born particles?

Homework Equations


\begin{align}
W_{before}&=W_{after}\\
p_{before}&=p_{after}\\
W^2 &= {W_0}^2 + p^2c^2 \longleftarrow \substack{\text{Lorentz invariant}}
\end{align}

The Attempt at a Solution


First i wrote the energy conservation law:
\begin{align}
W_{before} &= W_{after}\\
W_{k1} + W_{k2} + 2W_{0p} &= \sqrt{{W_{0~after}}^2 +p^2c^2}\longleftarrow\substack{\text{Here the $W_{0~after}$ is a full}\\\text{rest energy after colision}}\\
W_{k1} + W_{k2} + 2W_{0p} &= \sqrt{\underbrace{\left( 2W_{0p} + W_{0m} \right)^2}_{\smash{\substack{\text{after collision we have}\\\text{2 $p^+$ and new mass $m$}}}} +p^2c^2}
\end{align}

Here i am not sure what to do with the ##p^2c^2##. Can i just take the mass frame and say ##p=0##? Why yes and why not?

Other option i am thinking of is to say that ##pc = \sqrt{{W_{k~before}}^2 - 2W_{k~before}W_{0~before}}##. Here i know that ##W_{0~before}=2W_{0p}##, but i am not sure what to put in for ##W_{k~before}##. Can i do it like ##W_{k~before} = W_{k1}+W_{k2}##?

Which of these two options is right/wrong and why? If both are wrong please tell me how to fix them to become ok.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Taking the center of mass frame is useful for simplifying the calculations.
Remember that the kinetic energies will change.

Why do you think there are still two protons around after the collision?

Note - you can also use the form: ##W_k=(\gamma -1)mc^2##
 
Simon Bridge said:
Taking the center of mass frame is useful for simplifying the calculations.
Remember that the kinetic energies will change.
How will they change? I guess one will be bigger and other will be smaller than in lab. frame. How do i calculate this? I will also need to calculate the speed of the COM frame.

Simon Bridge said:
Why do you think there are still two protons around after the collision?
I have heard that new mass can be formed in the proximity of the massive bodies - protons have mass...

Simon Bridge said:
Note - you can also use the form: ##W_k=(\gamma -1)mc^2##
To calculate the speed of COM? Where would this eq. come in handy?
 
The total energy of a mass moving at speed v is ##E=\gamma mc^2## - it's just the Einstein mass-energy relation. You keep using ##E^2=m^2c^4+p^2c^2## instead. The kinetic energy is the total energy with the rest-mass energy ##mc^2## removed, thus, ##W_k=(\gamma-1)mc^2##.

Thus ##\gamma^2m^2c^4 = m^2c^4+p^2c*2##
... it can be a useful way to think about your problem in any reference frame.

If you do not have course notes on how to convert to center-of-mass in relativity, it is probably not a good idea to do so.

As it happens - in p-p scattering you get more particle sout than in, so the rest-energy is recovered and two of the particles are protons. This suggests that only the kinetic energy is available make new particles.

The folowing course-notes walks you through the ohysics:
http://galileo.phys.virginia.edu/classes/252/particle_creation.html
 
Thank you.
 
Hello everyone, I’m considering a point charge q that oscillates harmonically about the origin along the z-axis, e.g. $$z_{q}(t)= A\sin(wt)$$ In a strongly simplified / quasi-instantaneous approximation I ignore retardation and take the electric field at the position ##r=(x,y,z)## simply to be the “Coulomb field at the charge’s instantaneous position”: $$E(r,t)=\frac{q}{4\pi\varepsilon_{0}}\frac{r-r_{q}(t)}{||r-r_{q}(t)||^{3}}$$ with $$r_{q}(t)=(0,0,z_{q}(t))$$ (I’m aware this isn’t...
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
Back
Top