Bobbywhy said:
Will you please cite some acceptable reference(s) for the above claims and assertions? Thank you.
Bobbywhy
Sure. I'd be glad to. Incidentally there are patents as early as the 1930's that mention the term "psychoacoustics" and the studies of this phenomenon are responsible for such commonplace applications as bandpass filters on the telephone system, which reduced the amount of power needed (reduced bass response) while improving intelligibility (minimal high end harmonics even under distortion).
You can start here
Psychoacoustics. I can find more but it may take me some time as I have spent many years learning about and designing for psychoacoustic phenomena as well as instrumental voicing so I sometimes forget when and where I learned something as it is a continuum with my own experiences and experiments mixed in.
I also worked rather extensively with high powered Public Address systems where either raw intelligibility and/or pleasing sound were requirements. I've read almost everything http://www.synaudcon.com/site/about/don-carolyn/ ever wrote or was written about he and his family. Les Paul and
TomDowd are heroes to me and I studied their ideas much of my life.
Additionally, if you really want to get deep into the physics of electronic sound reproduction, and the nature of human hearing, google
Transient Intermodulation Distortion (don't leave off the "transient" part) as the history of how it was discovered, how it is measured, and how to design systems with minimal amounts of it is just fascinating. I have read so many books, and subscribed to so many trade publications on this subject alone, as well as built systems around it and phase cancellations, I'm afraid the source is so manifold it is difficult to link just one.
If you like me find this truly interesting and if it suits forum rules I'd be happy to answer any specifics I can.
Edit - There are many good treatises on human hearing, it's strengths, weaknesses, and idiosyncrasies but here is an excerpt about our amazing frequency discrimination
Frequency Discrimination