Two Spheres, Two Humans: Who is Older?

  • Thread starter Thread starter aritrasasmal
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Spheres
aritrasasmal
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Let there be two spheres in free space. Also there are two humans on each of them.
Now the spheres move apart and come together again(like a harmonic oscillator),
When they move apart , wrt one human the other is moving into lesser grav field and when he comes back he should have aged less than him. But to the other the observations are the same. So ehen they come together how will they agree on who is older? Will they?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The situation is symmetric, when they come back together, they should've aged at the same rate.
 
Polyrhythmic said:
The situation is symmetric, when they come back together, they should've aged at the same rate.

Please elaborate on your answer. Note we are looking from the point of view of each individual.
 
aritrasasmal said:
Please elaborate on your answer. Note we are looking from the point of view of each individual.

You're confusing SR inertial frame principles with GR non-inertial frames. Also, you have gravitational time dilation backwards - moving to lower gravity leads to faster aging, not slower.

Anyway, as they move apart, each experiences less gravity (strength due to combined masses), thus faster aging, then slower, completely symmetric. Each observes the other's clock moving the *same* as theirs, at all times.
 
It seems that he moves into a lesser grav field compare to the field before the move, not lesser than the field where the stationary man is, no?
 
What role do the spheres play in the example?

As Polyrhythmic said, it's a symmetric situation, so of course they'll agree.

aritrasasmal said:
When they move apart , wrt one human the other is moving into lesser grav field and when he comes back he should have aged less than him.

I think this must be where you're running into trouble. I assume you're talking about flat spacetime here. In a static spacetime, which this is, gravitational time dilation can be determined from the gravitational potential (not the field). In a flat spacetime, there is a constant gravitational potential, so there's no gravitational time dilation.
 
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Back
Top