Two Spheres, Two Humans: Who is Older?

  • Thread starter Thread starter aritrasasmal
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Spheres
aritrasasmal
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Let there be two spheres in free space. Also there are two humans on each of them.
Now the spheres move apart and come together again(like a harmonic oscillator),
When they move apart , wrt one human the other is moving into lesser grav field and when he comes back he should have aged less than him. But to the other the observations are the same. So ehen they come together how will they agree on who is older? Will they?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The situation is symmetric, when they come back together, they should've aged at the same rate.
 
Polyrhythmic said:
The situation is symmetric, when they come back together, they should've aged at the same rate.

Please elaborate on your answer. Note we are looking from the point of view of each individual.
 
aritrasasmal said:
Please elaborate on your answer. Note we are looking from the point of view of each individual.

You're confusing SR inertial frame principles with GR non-inertial frames. Also, you have gravitational time dilation backwards - moving to lower gravity leads to faster aging, not slower.

Anyway, as they move apart, each experiences less gravity (strength due to combined masses), thus faster aging, then slower, completely symmetric. Each observes the other's clock moving the *same* as theirs, at all times.
 
It seems that he moves into a lesser grav field compare to the field before the move, not lesser than the field where the stationary man is, no?
 
What role do the spheres play in the example?

As Polyrhythmic said, it's a symmetric situation, so of course they'll agree.

aritrasasmal said:
When they move apart , wrt one human the other is moving into lesser grav field and when he comes back he should have aged less than him.

I think this must be where you're running into trouble. I assume you're talking about flat spacetime here. In a static spacetime, which this is, gravitational time dilation can be determined from the gravitational potential (not the field). In a flat spacetime, there is a constant gravitational potential, so there's no gravitational time dilation.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
Back
Top