I Two square scale meeting point, when one is moved odd

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter rajeshmarndi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Point Scale Square
rajeshmarndi
Messages
319
Reaction score
0
There are two square scale. That is, it has marking where there are square i.e marking at 0,1,4,9,16,25 and so on. When one scale is moved, it slide over the other. Now if one scale is moved odd number i.e say 123 , that is, it's zero is placed at 123 over the other scale, now.

Now, can one know, if the squares on the two scales meet more than once?

Atleast twice because for every odd number there will always be two consecutive square whose gap is an odd number i.e 123 is gap between squares 61 and 62. So square 62 in one scale will meet at 61 square on the other scale that is moved. Thanks.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I interpret your question as "for a given number n, how many pairs of squared integers are there that have a difference of n?" As an example, n=15 leads to (1,16) and (49,64).

This number is always finite, and for odd n you found the largest pair already. In general there can be others as well, it depends on the number n.
 
mfb said:
In general there can be others as well, it depends on the number n.
If we take n(odd) as very large, is there a way we can tell if it will have atleast two squared integers pairs.
 
The difference between k2 and (k+3)2 is 6k+9=3(2k+3), the difference between k and (k+5)2 is 10k+25=5(2k+5) and so on. If a number can be written as such a product then there are squares with this difference.
The second factor can be every odd number larger than the first one (as k>0 unless we count 0 as square number). Every factorization of n will work apart from its square root. The only odd numbers without additional solutions are primes and squares of primes. If you count 0 as square number, then primes are the only exception.
 
For large numbers we cannot say if they will have atleast two square integers pairs. Because we cannot know its factorization i.e we cannot say its primality.
 
We can test the primality...
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top