Two Velocities in the Lorentz Law

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the Lorentz force, which involves two velocities: v1, the velocity of a test particle, and v2, the velocity of particles in a wire. Both velocities are essential for understanding relativistic effects, such as length contraction, in special relativity. The relationship between these velocities is crucial for analyzing the interaction of charged particles with magnetic fields. The conversation emphasizes that electricity and magnetism are interconnected aspects of the same phenomenon rather than one causing the other. Understanding the relative velocities is key to grasping the underlying principles of electromagnetism.
sawer
Messages
65
Reaction score
2
Lorentz Force: $$\vec{F}=q\vec{v_1}\times\vec{B}$$

v1 is the velocity of particle.

And magnetic field is: $$\vec{B}=\frac{\mu_0}{4\pi}\vec{v_2}\times\frac{\hat{r}}{r^2}$$

If we combine them, we see that there are 2 velocities:

v1 and v2...

I just watched this video about relativity and magnetism:



So v1 is the velocity of the particle and v2 is the velocity of the particle in the wire. Right?

We need both of these velocities to get the relativistic effect, I mean length contradiction for the wire. Right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In special relativity, you need to know the relative velocities of all the objects you are interested in.
The important thing is to concentrate on what the velocity is relative to.

Off those equations:
v1 would be of the test particle wrt the magnetic field.
v2 is the effective velocity of the particles in the current - in the video, this is being modeled by a line of charge - with respect to the wire.

How much info you need depends on what you want to know and what you already know. For instance:
To get the separation of the charges in the wire, knowing the separation at some other (known) relative velocity, you only need the new relative velocity.

The unification of electricity and magnetism is what the video is trying to show you - it's not a case of one causes the other: they are both aspects of the same kind of stuff.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
338
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
66
Views
27K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top