Type II superconductors definition?

Mk
Messages
2,039
Reaction score
4
What is the definiton of a high temperature superconductor otherwise known as Type II superconductors?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
"What is the definiton of a high temperature superconductor otherwise known as Type II superconductors?"

You need to be a bit careful here. High-Tc superconductors do not have the identical definition as "Type II" superconductors. There are plenty of Type II superconductors that are not high-Tc superconductors. It just happens that all high-Tc superconductors that we have discovered are type II also.

Originally, high-Tc superconductors are the cuprate superconductors first discovered by Bednorz and Mueller. Most people would put Tc of greater than 35K for something to be considered as "high". This number isn't arbitrary. It was originally thought (pre 1986) that this is the upper limit that phonon-mediated superconductivity can get to based on our understanding of conventional superconductors.

Currently, there are several "families" of compounds that may be considered as belonging to the "high-Tc" superconductors, in addition to the cuprates. This includes possibly the ruthenates (even though their Tc's are lower than 35K), and MgB2 compound that was discovered barely 2 years ago.

Zz.
 


Type II superconductors are materials that exhibit superconductivity at high temperatures, typically above the boiling point of liquid nitrogen (77 K). They are also known as high temperature superconductors (HTS) and were first discovered in the late 1980s. Unlike Type I superconductors, which completely lose their electrical resistance at a specific critical temperature, Type II superconductors have a mixed state where some of the material remains in the normal state while others exhibit superconductivity. This mixed state allows for higher critical temperatures and stronger magnetic fields to be sustained, making Type II superconductors more practical for real-world applications. The exact definition of a high temperature superconductor varies, but it is generally considered to be any material that exhibits superconductivity above the temperature of liquid nitrogen.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top