Typical stellar distances of visible stars in the Milky Way

AI Thread Summary
Most visible stars in the night sky are located within a few dozen to 1,000 light years from Earth, with many bright stars like Betelgeuse and Polaris being significantly farther at 550 and 300 light years, respectively. The nearest star, Alpha Centauri, is just 4 light years away, yet appears bright despite being similar in brightness to the Sun. The visibility of stars is influenced by their brightness and the presence of interstellar dust, which can obscure light. While individual stars are mostly within 1,000 light years, collections of stars, such as those in the Andromeda galaxy, can be seen from much greater distances. Overall, the average visibility of sun-like stars is limited to about 20 light years.
Holocene
Messages
237
Reaction score
0
How far away is the average star in the night sky?

I mean, can we see stars that are on the other side of the galaxy?

Perhaps most of the visible stars are maybe just a few dozen light years away?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Most are within about 100light years ( the milky way is 100,000 light years across)
The sample of visible stars is obviously biased by very bright stars. Betelgeuse is a particulalrly bright red giant, it is one of the brightest stars in the sky but is at a distance of 550 lyr, Polaris is also a very bright star at around 300lyr,
The nearest star is Alpha Centauri is only 4lyr and is only about the same brightness as the sun but appears as a bright star.
 
Virtually all individual stars visible to the naked eye are within 1000 light years of earth. We can, however, see collections of stars [like the Andromeda galaxy] at much greater distances.
 
Assuming we can see stars down to a limiting brightness of 6th magnitude, in the absence of interstellar dust which blocks out the light, an F-type supergiant would be visible out to about 4000 parsecs - over 10,000 light years. An "average" sun-like star is only visible to about 20 light years away though!
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top