Ubuntu 14.04 & Windows VNC Program

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the challenges of connecting to Ubuntu 14.04 from a Windows machine using VNC software after an upgrade. Participants explore alternatives to TightVNC that support the TLS security type required by Ubuntu 14.04.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that TightVNC cannot connect to Ubuntu 14.04 due to a known bug related to TLS security type (18) and seeks freeware alternatives that support this security type.
  • Another participant suggests NoMachine as a potential alternative to TightVNC, expressing satisfaction with its performance.
  • A different participant mentions Windows' built-in Remote Desktop Connection as a solution, along with XRDP as an open-source server for this protocol, although they express uncertainty about its performance with desktop environments like Unity or KDE Plasma.
  • There is a mention of using SSH with MobiXTerm to forward the desktop, but concerns are raised about the speed of X-forwarding over non-gigabit networks.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants present multiple competing views on alternative solutions to TightVNC, with no consensus on a single best option. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the effectiveness of the proposed alternatives.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the performance of XRDP with different desktop environments and the speed of X-forwarding over various network types.

StevieTNZ
Messages
1,944
Reaction score
837
Hi there

A while back I updated Ubuntu to version 14.04. Before this, I could connect to the machine through TightVNC from my Windows 8.1 laptop.

However after the upgrade things didn't run smoothly. It is now a known bug that usual VNC software can't connect to Ubuntu 14.04 because it uses security TLS type (18), which TightVNC doesn't support.

My question is: is there any freeware available (for Windows) that does the job like TightVNC, but supports TLS security type 18?

The bug I report is mentioned https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/ source/vino/ bug/1281250

Many thanks for any assistance
Stevie
 
Computer science news on Phys.org
Whew I was a bit worried when I saw the subject line as I too felt stuck with VNC, knowing it was "dirty" but have no viable alternatives. Congrats on seeking a solid alternative. I think you may find this to your liking - https://www.nomachine.com/
 
enorbet said:
Whew I was a bit worried when I saw the subject line as I too felt stuck with VNC, knowing it was "dirty" but HAD no viable alternatives. Congrats on seeking a solid alternative. I think you may find this to your liking - https://www.nomachine.com/

Please forgive the self-quote. I'm a beast with a text editor but a fumbler with "rich-text" and maybe forum conventions. I merely wished to edit my post to change a mistake in tense and could see no other way to accomplish this (no longer showed an "edit" button). What method is right and proper or is there a time limit on edits?

BOT - Hope most followed the link to NOMACHINE... it is quite good.
 
Yes, I know the exact solution you are looking for.

Windows has a built-in server and client called Remote Desktop Connection. It works similar to VNC and forwards the whole graphics system.

XRDP is an open source server for this protocol. I don't really use it, but I tested it out and installed it on my Ubuntu server and it works fine. My server doesn't have X or a desktop manager installed, so I cannot speak from experience how well it works connecting to a unity or KDE plasma desktop, but it is able to give me the basic X-server environment (a terminal and opening windows) on my Windows Devices.

The other option I know of off the top of my head is to SSH into the Linux box using something like MobiXTerm. You should be able to start and forward the entire desktop from the command line, though I am not sure how quick X-forwarding would be in that case, especially if you are not on a gigabit network but rather using something like Wifi.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 123 ·
5
Replies
123
Views
20K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
10K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
10K