UC Davis or UC san diego for chemical engineering?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the decision between transferring to UC Irvine and UC Davis for a student aiming for a PhD program after undergraduate studies. The student is also awaiting a response from Berkeley, which has become a preferred option after receiving acceptance. Concerns about the academic rankings of UCSD (18th) and UC Davis (30th) are raised, but it is suggested that these rankings may not significantly impact graduate school admissions. The consensus is that graduate programs tend to evaluate the overall reputation of undergraduate institutions rather than specific departmental rankings. Both UC Irvine and UC Davis are acknowledged for their solid academic reputations, and the student expresses a preference for Davis due to its proximity to home. The conversation concludes with the student feeling relieved about their acceptance to Berkeley, despite potential challenges in securing a research position there.
vincent_vega
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
I'm about to transfer out of a community college, and so far I got accepted to these two. I'm still waiting on Berkeley, but if I don't get in which of these two would be better if I want to go on to a phd program after undergrad? does it even matter? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Judging by website alone, UC Irvine seems to have something a little more put together than UCSD. UCSD only seems to have a Nanoengineering program and not a real Chem E group.

You can check their department brochure here:

https://webfiles.uci.edu/hdn/UCI_ChEMS_Brochure.pdf
 
Thanks, but I said uc davis :p

All I know is that san diego is ranked around 18th and davis is 30th. Is that in issue for grad school later on?

If the ranking doesn't matter then I prefer Davis because it's only 1.5 hours away from my house. San Diego is like 9.

But if the difference in rank is significant, then UCSD it is.
 
Last edited:
I'm assuming you are looking at the USnews rankings? I seriously doubt it would be an issue for graduate admissions. I think when graduate schools gauge school quality they look at the school's undergraduate reputation overall rather than at the school's research reputation in said field. Looking at the USnews rankings for chemical engineering Harvard isn't in the top ten and Uminnesota - Twin Cities is #4 but it would be ridiculous to give an applicant from UM an edge over someone from Harvard. Plenty of fantastic undergraduate schools don't even HAVE graduate science programs yet I can assure you a degree from Harvey Mudd is far from worthless. :)

All things considered both schools have a good academic reputation, I wouldn't worry about small academic differences in quality as is perceived by a news magazine. I'm sure graduate schools don't either.
 
Last edited:
^ Thanks for all the info. I just got into berkeley though so my decision has been made easier. It's probably going to be harder to get a research spot though
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...
Back
Top