Ultra-Relativistic Particle Decaying to Identical Particles

AI Thread Summary
It is impossible for an ultra-relativistic particle with momentum significantly greater than its rest mass energy to decay into two identical massive particles. The conservation of four momentum leads to a contradiction when attempting to satisfy energy and momentum conservation for the decay products. Specifically, the derived energy of the decay products, E = M/2, does not align with the conditions set by the ultra-relativistic assumption. The key factor is whether the mass of the parent particle M is greater than twice the mass of the decay products, 2m. Thus, the problem's formulation may be flawed or lacking necessary information.
GL_Black_Hole
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Show that it is impossible for an ultra-relativistic particle with ##pc>>Mc^2## to disintegrate into two identical massive particles of mass m.

Homework Equations


Conservation of four momentum

The Attempt at a Solution


The four momentum of the ultra-relativistic particle in its rest frame is ##p^{\mu} = (M,0)## and the decay products will have identical energy and momenta so writing the four momentum of the second particle in terms of the first and the parent particle: ##p_2^{\mu} = p^{\mu} -p_1^{\mu}## we can take magnitudes and find: ##-m^2+m^2 = -M^2 +2ME## where ##E## is the energy of the decay products. So ##E =M/2## and the magnitude of the daughter's four momenta are: ##|p| = \frac{\sqrt{M^4 -4M^2 m^2}}{2M}##.
I don't see how to use the ultra-relativistic condition to reach a contradiction here.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The question is wrong or missing information. You can always go to the rest frame of the decaying particle so whether it is ultra relativistic or not is irrelevant. The only relevant thing is whether or not M > 2m.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top