Unable to understand vector derivative

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter GiuseppeR7
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derivative Vector
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of vector derivatives in relation to different frames of reference, specifically frames A and B that are in motion relative to each other. The key takeaway is that when differentiating a time-dependent vector R in frame A, the derivative with respect to frame B incorporates the velocity of frame A, represented as v_A. The origins of the frames do not affect the derivative, as constants drop out in the differentiation process. The confusion arose from misleading notation in a referenced paper.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector calculus
  • Familiarity with time-dependent coordinate transformations
  • Knowledge of relative motion between frames of reference
  • Basic principles of differentiation in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of time-dependent coordinate transformations in physics
  • Learn about vector differentiation in multiple reference frames
  • Explore the implications of frame origins on vector calculus
  • Review advanced vector calculus techniques and notation
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those studying mechanics and relativity, as well as anyone interested in advanced vector calculus and its applications in different reference frames.

GiuseppeR7
Messages
61
Reaction score
2
Hi guys...i'm having a bad time understanding the concept of vector derivative with respect to different frames.
Suppose i have the vector displayed in the picture, the frame A and B are in motion with respect of each other, i can understand the concept of the derivative of the vector R in the frame A...but what does it mean the derivative of the vector with respect to B since the frame's origins are not coincident?
Thanks!
 

Attachments

  • vec.jpg
    vec.jpg
    3.5 KB · Views: 404
Physics news on Phys.org
Vectors that are time dependent are differentiated according to the definition.
If there is a time-dependent coordinate transformation between two frames of reference, that simply comes in:
So if frame A origin as described in frame B is at ##\vec A_0(t) ## and moves with velocity ##\vec v_A##,
and the derivative of ##\vec R## in frame A is ## \vec v_{\rm frame \ a} ## then $$
{d\,\vec R_{\rm frame\ b} \over dt} = { d \left ( \vec R(t) + \vec A_0(t) \right ) \over dt } = \vec v_{\rm frame \ a} + \vec v_A $$

(I do hope this isn't in a relativity course context ?)

That the frame origins are not coincident does not appear in the derivative. ##\vec A_0(0) ## is a constant and drops out. You can check that by writing out the definition in full.
 
Thanks for the reply...a bad paper misleaded me on this topic!
 
How did it manage to do so ?
 
it was using a confusing notation! :p
 
GiuseppeR7 said:
Hi guys...i'm having a bad time understanding the concept of vector derivative with respect to different frames.
Suppose i have the vector displayed in the picture, the frame A and B are in motion with respect of each other, i can understand the concept of the derivative of the vector R in the frame A...but what does it mean the derivative of the vector with respect to B since the frame's origins are not coincident?
You seem to have already solved your problem, however your question is ambiguous: what does "derivative of the vector R in the frame A" means? I know what is a "derivative of a vector with respect to time" or what is a "vector written using different systems of coordinates", but I don't know what it is what you have said.

--
lightarrow
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
393
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
975
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K