Unambiguous Evidence for Weak Neutral Currents

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the observation of weak neutral currents, specifically the process (anti muon neutrino) + (electron) -> (anti muon neutrino) + (electron), which serves as unambiguous evidence for weak neutral currents. In contrast, the process (anti electron neutrino) + (electron) -> (anti electron neutrino) + (electron) can occur via both W+ and Z0 bosons, complicating its interpretation. The participants clarify that the weak interaction does not violate charge conservation, addressing concerns about potential charge violations in weak interactions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of weak interactions in particle physics
  • Familiarity with Feynman diagrams and their interpretation
  • Knowledge of particle types: neutrinos, electrons, and their antiparticles
  • Basic principles of charge conservation in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the role of Z0 bosons in weak neutral currents
  • Learn about the differences between weak and electromagnetic interactions
  • Explore advanced Feynman diagram techniques for particle interactions
  • Investigate charge conservation laws in various particle reactions
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, particle physicists, and anyone interested in the fundamentals of weak interactions and their implications in particle decay processes.

hob
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



What observation of the process: (anti muon neutrino) + (electron) -> (anti muon neutrino) + (electron) constitutes unambiguous evidence for weak neutral currents,

whereas the observation of (anti electron neutrino) + (electron) -> (anti electron neutrino) + (electron)

The Attempt at a Solution




The solution is the first one:

{www}.scribbleproductions.co.uk/stuff/fine1.jpg

Since the second reaction can undergo via W+ as well as Z0:

{www}.scribbleproductions.co.uk/stuff/fine2.jpg


My question is in the Feynman diagrams, why could you not have this for example:

An electron decaying to a muon neutrino ?

{www}.scribbleproductions.co.uk/stuff/fine3.jpg

Apparently the weak interaction also violates charge conservation, but I have never seen a possible reaction with a Feynman diagram that is violated at the vertices's.

Many thanks for any help :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hob said:

Homework Statement



What observation of the process: (anti muon neutrino) + (electron) -> (anti muon neutrino) + (electron) constitutes unambiguous evidence for weak neutral currents,

whereas the observation of (anti electron neutrino) + (electron) -> (anti electron neutrino) + (electron)

The Attempt at a Solution




The solution is the first one:

{www}.scribbleproductions.co.uk/stuff/fine1.jpg

Since the second reaction can undergo via W+ as well as Z0:

{www}.scribbleproductions.co.uk/stuff/fine2.jpg


My question is in the Feynman diagrams, why could you not have this for example:

An electron decaying to a muon neutrino ?

{www}.scribbleproductions.co.uk/stuff/fine3.jpg

Apparently the weak interaction also violates charge conservation, but I have never seen a possible reaction with a Feynman diagram that is violated at the vertices's.

Many thanks for any help :)

The weak interaction does NOT violate charge conservation! So your third diagram is impossible. Charge is always conserved
 
nrqed said:
The weak interaction does NOT violate charge conservation! So your third diagram is impossible. Charge is always conserved

Thanks for that, I was a bit uneasy to see charge violation.

Does weak violate anything to do with charge? I remember seeing something about charge violation that only the weak does not strong or e.m

Regards,
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K