Unambiguous Evidence for Weak Neutral Currents

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on identifying unambiguous evidence for weak neutral currents through specific particle interactions. The reaction involving an anti muon neutrino and an electron is highlighted as definitive evidence, while the alternative reaction with an anti electron neutrino can occur via both W+ and Z0 bosons. A question arises regarding the possibility of an electron decaying into a muon neutrino, which is deemed impossible due to charge conservation principles. Participants clarify that the weak interaction does not violate charge conservation, addressing concerns about potential charge violations in weak interactions. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding Feynman diagrams in relation to these particle processes.
hob
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



What observation of the process: (anti muon neutrino) + (electron) -> (anti muon neutrino) + (electron) constitutes unambiguous evidence for weak neutral currents,

whereas the observation of (anti electron neutrino) + (electron) -> (anti electron neutrino) + (electron)

The Attempt at a Solution




The solution is the first one:

{www}.scribbleproductions.co.uk/stuff/fine1.jpg

Since the second reaction can undergo via W+ as well as Z0:

{www}.scribbleproductions.co.uk/stuff/fine2.jpg


My question is in the Feynman diagrams, why could you not have this for example:

An electron decaying to a muon neutrino ?

{www}.scribbleproductions.co.uk/stuff/fine3.jpg

Apparently the weak interaction also violates charge conservation, but I have never seen a possible reaction with a Feynman diagram that is violated at the vertices's.

Many thanks for any help :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hob said:

Homework Statement



What observation of the process: (anti muon neutrino) + (electron) -> (anti muon neutrino) + (electron) constitutes unambiguous evidence for weak neutral currents,

whereas the observation of (anti electron neutrino) + (electron) -> (anti electron neutrino) + (electron)

The Attempt at a Solution




The solution is the first one:

{www}.scribbleproductions.co.uk/stuff/fine1.jpg

Since the second reaction can undergo via W+ as well as Z0:

{www}.scribbleproductions.co.uk/stuff/fine2.jpg


My question is in the Feynman diagrams, why could you not have this for example:

An electron decaying to a muon neutrino ?

{www}.scribbleproductions.co.uk/stuff/fine3.jpg

Apparently the weak interaction also violates charge conservation, but I have never seen a possible reaction with a Feynman diagram that is violated at the vertices's.

Many thanks for any help :)

The weak interaction does NOT violate charge conservation! So your third diagram is impossible. Charge is always conserved
 
nrqed said:
The weak interaction does NOT violate charge conservation! So your third diagram is impossible. Charge is always conserved

Thanks for that, I was a bit uneasy to see charge violation.

Does weak violate anything to do with charge? I remember seeing something about charge violation that only the weak does not strong or e.m

Regards,
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top