Unbanked Curve Motion: Friction vs Intuition

AI Thread Summary
In unbanked curve motion, friction provides the necessary centripetal force to keep a car on a curved path, despite the common misconception that friction always opposes motion. While kinetic friction opposes relative motion, static friction is at play when tires roll without slipping, preventing lateral movement. The force applied by the car to the surface includes components that counteract the slope and facilitate motion. Static friction adjusts to prevent slipping, ensuring the vehicle follows the intended trajectory. Understanding these dynamics clarifies why friction does not always act against the direction of motion in curved paths.
JJ__
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
This is just a conceptual question. I get that when a car is turning on an unbanked curve, the friction provides the centripetal force. I don't understand why this is though. I thought friction is supposed to oppose the direction of motion. But that would imply that the direction of motion points directly out from the circle. But intuitively it seems like the direction of motion would be tangent to the circle (i.e. perpendicular to the friction)...
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The same question arises if I walk (or cycle, or drive) across a slope in a direction perpendicular to the slope (or at any angle not parallel to the slope.)
I think the way to look at this is to see that, in order to move in such a way, I need to apply an appropriate force to the surface and friction acts opposite to this force. That force will involve components up the slope and in the direction of motion.
The deceptive element is that simple friction questions involve objects moving parallel to any slope, so that the force we apply is parallel to the motion.
Friction does not always act in the direction of motion. Rather perhaps, the net force, including a contribution from friction, acts in the direction of any acceleration (or negative acceleration, aka deceleration.)
 
JJ__ said:
I thought friction is supposed to oppose the direction of motion.
Kinetic friction opposes the direction of relative motion. But the surface of the tire and the surface of the road are not in relative motion. The wheels are rolling so that the contact patch does not slip on the pavement. Instead, we are dealing with static friction.

Static friction provides whatever force is needed to prevent relative motion between two surfaces. The contact patch is not slipping. There is no relative motion. The wheels are free to roll forward or backward. Accordingly, little or no static friction is needed parallel to the car's motion to prevent slippage fore and aft. However, unless the tires slip right or left, the car is constrained to move along the curved path where the wheels point. Static friction acts to prevent the tires from slipping right or left away from this path.

Of course, static friction can only provide force up to the limit imposed by the coefficient of static friction.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Let there be a person in a not yet optimally designed sled at h meters in height. Let this sled free fall but user can steer by tilting their body weight in the sled or by optimal sled shape design point it in some horizontal direction where it is wanted to go - in any horizontal direction but once picked fixed. How to calculate horizontal distance d achievable as function of height h. Thus what is f(h) = d. Put another way, imagine a helicopter rises to a height h, but then shuts off all...
Back
Top