B Uncertainty Principle & Non-Commuting Observables

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter Anupama
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Relation
Anupama
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Do all observables which do not commute generate an uncertainty principle ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The uncertainty principle applies to all observables. The act of knowing that the object does not commute makes you unsure about where it is.
 
Anupama said:
Do all observables which do not commute generate an uncertainty principle ?
Yes you can put it like that, depending on what mean by uncertainty principle.

That observables does not commute simply means that they aren't independent. The details of this dependence can vary depending on what observables we talk about. "Conjugate variables" are related by means of the Fourier transform and is what one most commonly refers to. But in principle one can imagine any relation between independent variables that will imply some kind of "generalized uncertainty relation" that described a relation that constraints their mutual possible values, but not necessarily a simple one like for the case of x and p.

/Fredrik
 
Anupama said:
Do all observables which do not commute generate an uncertainty principle ?

Yes, the general uncertainty principle relates the uncertainty to the commutator of the two observables:

##\sigma_A^2 \sigma_B^2 \ge (\frac{1}{2i}\langle [\hat{A}, \hat{B}] \rangle)^2##
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top