Determining Photon Paths in a Double Slit System

  • Thread starter Thread starter kof9595995
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Uncertainty
kof9595995
Messages
676
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


Show that in order to be able to determine through which slit a double slit system each photon passes without destroying the double silt diffraction pattern, the condition
\delta y\delta {p_y} \ll \frac{h}{{4\pi }}
must be satisfied. Since this condition violated the uncertainty principle, it can not be met

Homework Equations


d\sin \theta = \lambda
\sin \theta = \frac{{\delta {p_y}}}{p}
\lambda = \frac{h}{p}

The Attempt at a Solution


In order not to destroy the pattern, the angle should not be large enough to shift one maximum to its adjacent maximum. So \sin \theta \ll \frac{\lambda }{d}, and then we have
\frac{{\delta {p_y}}}{p} \ll \frac{\lambda }{d}
To figure out which slit the photon passes through, we must have
\delta y \ll \frac{d}{2}
Combine these two and use de broglie's relation \lambda = \frac{h}{p}
We can get
\delta y\delta {p_y} \ll \frac{h}{2}

But it seems to me the extra 2\pi just comes out from nowhere. I'm really pulling my hair off on this quetsion

Homework Statement


Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution

 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I was stuck with this problem as well, and your approach provided the spark. Thanks so much :smile:.
However following up on your argument, let's look at it this way:
"In order not to destroy the pattern, the angle should not be large enough to shift one maximum to its adjacent MINIMUM". My point here is that if the bright band/s merge with the dark band/s, THAT would destroy the interference pattern . So Sin Θ < λ/2d (would this then be right, btw ?). Hence ΔPy/P < λ/2d.
Next, to figure out which slit the photon passes through, and quite arbitrarily frankly, I assume Δy < d/8 (as opposed to d/2)
Pulling all this together we then get: ΔPy/Δy < h/16, and since h/16 < h/4π.
Hence ΔPyΔy < h/4π !
Can anybody do better ?!
 
Hello everyone, I’m considering a point charge q that oscillates harmonically about the origin along the z-axis, e.g. $$z_{q}(t)= A\sin(wt)$$ In a strongly simplified / quasi-instantaneous approximation I ignore retardation and take the electric field at the position ##r=(x,y,z)## simply to be the “Coulomb field at the charge’s instantaneous position”: $$E(r,t)=\frac{q}{4\pi\varepsilon_{0}}\frac{r-r_{q}(t)}{||r-r_{q}(t)||^{3}}$$ with $$r_{q}(t)=(0,0,z_{q}(t))$$ (I’m aware this isn’t...
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
Back
Top