B Uncertainty Calculations for Electrical Measurements

CookieSalesman
Messages
103
Reaction score
5
I know the rules to experimental uncertainties with addition and subtraction, but what about division?

For instance here
The light bulb was measured to have 1.27 ±.05V by the DMM in parallel. Using the DMM in series, its current drawn was .202 ±1A. As a result its resistance was approximately 6.28±.05V/A.

I'm not totally sure if I've done it right...

Is there any large reference book for all of these rules for future insight?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Division will have an asymmetric effect on uncertainty. You can understand the uncertainty calculations in one of two ways, either as a statistical expression (this is the mean plus or minus some multiple of the standard deviation) or as an interval calculation (the value is in the interval centered at this number plus or minus the interval radius).

In the latter case dividing by an uncertain quantity can yield infinite uncertainty: If b = 0.2 +/- 0.3, and a= 3 then a/b is somewhere below -30 or above +6 since both the positive and negative sides of zero are possible in the denominator you can get numbers ranging to + or - infinity.

But as long as 0 is not in the interval you can apply the arithmetic in a relatively straight forward way. To divide by an interval figure out the minimum and maximum quotient values by respectively dividing by the max and min (note the reversal) values for the denominator. Then re-express in terms of a center plus or minus a radius. There may be discipline specific conventions but that is the general method so far as I know. The subject name is interval arithmetic searching that should give you all sorts of references.
 
As long as the relative uncertainty is not too large, you can always estimate the uncertainty contribution of x to f(x,y,z,...) as
$$\Delta_x f(x,y,z,...) = \Delta x |\frac{df(x,y,z,...)}{dx}(x)|$$
where ##\Delta x## is the uncertainty on x, df/dx is the derivative with respect to x (evaluated at your central value for x), and ##\Delta_x f## is the uncertainty on f coming from the uncertainty on x. Multiple independent uncertain input parameters can be evaluated individually and added in quadrature.

This fails if the uncertainty is too large, or if you have correlated uncertainties in the inputs, then you'll need more complex methods.
 
Thanks guys
 
All I was taught is that in uncertainty calculations the relative uncertainties are summed up for quotients and products. So it would be RUncertainty voltage + Runcertainty of current.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top